ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. A2024
Machine-Learned Potentials by Active Learning from Organic Crystal Structure Prediction Landscapes.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. A, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stepwise quantum chemical optimization reveals the origin of layered herringbone packing and polymorphism in polyacenes.Communications chemistry · 2026Article
- Computational data as the fuel for AI in chemistry.Chemical science · 2026Review
- Exploring celecoxib polymorph landscape using AIMNet2 machine learning interatomic potential.Chemical science · 2026Article
- CellTune: an integrative software for accurate cell classification in spatial proteomics.Nature methods · 2026Article
- Electron Affinity of Actinide (IV) Carboxylate Complexes From MN12-L Density-Functional Calculations and Explainable Machine Learning.Journal of computational chemistry · 2026Article
- Siamese foundation models for crystal structure prediction.Nature communications · 2026Article
- From polymorphs to cocrystals and salts: successfully predicting axitinib's challenging crystal forms.Chemical science · 2025Article
- Efficient Molecular Crystal Structure Prediction and Stability Assessment with AIMNet2 Neural Network Potentials.Crystal growth & design · 2025Article
- Accurate and efficient machine learning interatomic potentials for finite temperature modelling of molecular crystals.Chemical science · 2025Article
- One Size Fits All? Development of the CPOSS209 Data Set of Experimental and Hypothetical Polymorphs for Testing Computational Modeling Methods.Crystal growth & design · 2025Article
- Predictive crystallography at scale: mapping, validating, and learning from 1000 crystal energy landscapes.Faraday discussions · 2025Article
- Data-efficient fine-tuning of foundational models for first-principles quality sublimation enthalpies.Faraday discussions · 2025Article
- Stable and accurate atomistic simulations of flexible molecules using conformationally generalisable machine learned potentials.Chemical science · 2024Article
- Crystal Structure Landscape of Diarylethene-Based Crystalline Solids: A Comprehensive CSD Analysis.Crystal growth & design · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A primary challenge in organic molecular crystal structure prediction (CSP) is accurately ranking the energies of potential structures. While high-level solid-state density functional theory (DFT) methods allow for mostly reliable discrimination of the low-energy structures, their high computational cost is problematic because of the need to evaluate tens to hundreds of thousands of trial crystal structures to fully explore typical crystal energy landscapes. Consequently, lower-cost but less accurate empirical force fields are often used, sometimes as the first stage of a hierarchical scheme involving multiple stages of increasingly accurate energy calculations. Machine-learned interatomic potentials (MLIPs), trained to reproduce the results of ab initio methods with computational costs close to those of force fields, can improve the efficiency of the CSP by reducing or eliminating the need for costly DFT calculations. Here, we investigate active learning methods for training MLIPs with CSP datasets. The combination of active learning with the well-developed sampling methods from CSP yields potentials in a highly automated workflow that are relevant over a wide range of the crystal packing space. To demonstrate these potentials, we illustrate efficiently reranking large, diverse crystal structure landscapes to near-DFT accuracy from force field-based CSP, improving the reliability of the final energy ranking. Furthermore, we demonstrate how these potentials can be extended to more accurately model structures far from lattice energy minima through additional on-the-fly training within Monte Carlo simulations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.