Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38277092›Full record

ArticleInfection2024

Complexity of patients with or without infectious disease consultation in tertiary-care hospitals in Germany.

C Meyer-Schwickerath, C Weber, D Hornuss, S Rieg, F Hitzenbichler, S Hagel, J Ankert, A Hennigs, J Glossmann, N Jung and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

C Meyer-SchwickerathDepartment I of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
C WeberDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
D HornussFaculty of Medicine, Department of Medicine II, Division of Infectious Diseases, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
S RiegFaculty of Medicine, Department of Medicine II, Division of Infectious Diseases, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
F HitzenbichlerDepartment of Infection Prevention and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
S HagelInstitute for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
J AnkertInstitute for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
A HennigsI. Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
J GlossmannCenter of Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
N JungDepartment I of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. norma.jung@uk-koeln.de.
German
Clinical Study Group in Infectious Diseases (DESTINi)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatients seen by infectious disease (ID) specialists are more complex compared to patients treated by other subspecialities according to Tonelli et al. (2018). However, larger studies on the complexity of patients related to the involvement of ID consultation services are missing.

methodsData of patients being treated in 2015 and 2019 in four different German university hospitals was retrospectively collected. Data were collected from the hospitals' software system and included whether the patients received an ID consultation as well as patient clinical complexity level (PCCL), case mix index (CMI) and length of stay (LOS) as a measurement for the patients' complexity. Furthermore, a comparison of patients with distinct infectious diseases treated with or without an ID consultation was initiated.

resultsIn total, 215.915 patients were included in the study, 3% (n = 6311) of those were seen by an ID consultant. Patients receiving ID consultations had a significantly (p < 0.05) higher PCCL (median 4 vs. 0), CMI (median 3,8 vs. 1,1) and deviation of the expected mean LOS (median 7 days vs. 0 days) than patients in the control group. No differences among hospitals or between years were observed. Comparing patients with distinct infectious diseases treated with or without an ID consultation, the differences were confirmed throughout the groups.

conclusionPatients receiving ID consultations are highly complex, frequently need further treatment after discharge and have a high economic impact. Thus, ID specialists should be clinically trained in a broad spectrum of diseases and treating these complex patients should be sufficiently remunerated.

Indexed as

Communicable DiseasesGermanyHumansReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesTertiary Care CentersComplexityGenderInfectious disease consultationsLength of stayPCCL

Identifiers

PMID38277092
PMCPMC10955003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.