ReviewClinical neuroradiology2024
Artificial Intelligence Imaging for Predicting High-risk Molecular Markers of Gliomas.
Review in Clinical neuroradiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Anatomy to Genomics Using a Multi-Task Deep Learning Approach for Comprehensive Glioma Profiling.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluation of an Image-based Classification Model to Identify Glioma Subtypes Using Arterial Spin Labeling Perfusion MRI On the Publicly Available UCSF Glioma Dataset.Clinical neuroradiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gliomas, the most prevalent primary malignant tumors of the central nervous system, present significant challenges in diagnosis and prognosis. The fifth edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System (WHO CNS5) published in 2021, has emphasized the role of high-risk molecular markers in gliomas. These markers are crucial for enhancing glioma grading and influencing survival and prognosis. Noninvasive prediction of these high-risk molecular markers is vital. Genetic testing after biopsy, the current standard for determining molecular type, is invasive and time-consuming. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers a non-invasive alternative, providing structural and functional insights into gliomas. Advanced MRI methods can potentially reflect the pathological characteristics associated with glioma molecular markers; however, they struggle to fully represent gliomas' high heterogeneity. Artificial intelligence (AI) imaging, capable of processing vast medical image datasets, can extract critical molecular information. AI imaging thus emerges as a noninvasive and efficient method for identifying high-risk molecular markers in gliomas, a recent focus of research. This review presents a comprehensive analysis of AI imaging's role in predicting glioma high-risk molecular markers, highlighting challenges and future directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38277059What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.