Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38277054›Full record

ArticleJournal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie2025

Effect of printing orientation on mechanical properties of 3D-printed orthodontic aligners.

Lukas Camenisch, Georgios Polychronis, Nearchos Panayi, Olga Makou, Spyridon N Papageorgiou, Spiros Zinelis, Theodore Eliades

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lukas CamenischClinic of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Center for Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Plattenstr. 11, 8032, Zurich, Switzerland.
Georgios PolychronisDepartment of Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Nearchos PanayiDepartment of Dentistry, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0025-9971
Olga MakouDepartment of Dentistry, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Spyridon N PapageorgiouClinic of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Center for Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Plattenstr. 11, 8032, Zurich, Switzerland. snpapage@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1968-3326
Spiros ZinelisDepartment of Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9188-7839
Theodore EliadesClinic of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Center for Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Plattenstr. 11, 8032, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2313-4979

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to assess differences in the fundamental mechanical properties of resin-made three-dimensional (3D) printed orthodontic aligners according to the printing orientation.

methodsTwenty resin 3D-printed dumbbell-shaped specimens and 20 orthodontic aligners were fabricated and postcured in nitrogen. Half of the specimens and aligners were built in horizontal (H), the other half in vertical (V) directions. The dumbbell-shaped specimens were loaded in a tensile testing machine, while parts of the aligners were embedded in acrylic resin, ground, polished, and then underwent instrumented indentation testing (IIT). Mechanical properties that were assessed included the yield strength (YS), breaking strength (BS), plastic strain (ε), Martens hardness (HM), indentation modulus (E

resultsNo significant differences were found between specimens or aligners printed either in a horizontal or a vertical direction (P > 0.05 in all instances). Overall, the 3D-printed aligners showed acceptable mechanical propertied in terms of YS (mean 19.2 MPa; standard deviation [SD] 1.7 MPa), BS (mean 19.6 MPa; SD 1.2 MPa), ε (mean 77%; SD 11%), HM (median 89.0 N/mm

conclusionPrinting direction seemed to have no effect on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed resin aligners, which are promising for orthodontic use.

Indexed as

Orthodontic Appliance DesignPrinting, Three-DimensionalElastic ModulusHardnessHumansMaterials TestingTensile StrengthInstrumented indentation testingMechanical propertiesOrthodontic alignerRemovable orthodontic appliancesThree-dimensional printing

Identifiers

PMID38277054
PMCPMC12181212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.