ReviewZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2024
Anakinra in idiopathic recurrent pericarditis: a comprehensive case series and literature review.
Review in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anakinra for recurrent pericarditis: a retrospective evaluation of long-term effectiveness, initiation timing and tapering.Rheumatology international · 2026Article
- Advancing multidisciplinary management of pediatric hyperinflammatory disorders.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
- Interleukin-1 Blockers: A Paradigm Shift in the Treatment of Recurrent Pericarditis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIdiopathic recurrent pericarditis (IRP) is defined by recurring episodes of pericardial inflammation without a known cause. This study investigates the safety and efficacy of anakinra, an interleukin‑1 inhibitor, as a successful therapy for IRP in cases resistant to conventional treatment.
methodsA retrospective evaluation of patients treated at our autoinflammatory center between 2011 and 2023 was conducted. Patient files were examined for demographic, clinical, and treatment response data, including nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids, and colchicine. Monogenic autoinflammatory disease screening was performed for Mediterranean Fever (MEFV), tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS), mevalonate kinase (MVK), nucleotide-binding domain, leucine-rich-containing family, pyrin domain-containing-3 (NLRP3), and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing protein 2 (NOD2). Patients who experienced multiple episodes of pericarditis were diagnosed with recurrent pericarditis. The study evaluated anakinra treatment in IRP patients unresponsive to conventional therapy.
resultsThe study included 21 participants, 9 (42.9%) female and 12 (57.1%) male. The average age of the participants was 43.1 ± 16.5 years. The MEFV mutation analysis revealed that 2 (9.5%) had a mutation in exon 10 and 4 (19.0%) had one in exon 2. Out of the 16 cases, 15 successfully discontinued steroid treatment. Four patients (19.0%) experienced injection site reactions. C‑reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured at an average of 196 ± 67.8 mg/l before and 2.6 ± 3.15 mg/l after anakinra treatment.
conclusionIn conclusion, the study adds to the growing evidence for the efficacy of interleukin-1 inhibitors, such as anakinra, as a promising treatment modality for IRP in cases resistant to conventional treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.