Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38276894›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of public health2024

A systematic review of literature examining the application of a social model of health and wellbeing.

Rachel Rahman, Caitlin Reid, Philip Kloer, Anna Henchie, Andrew Thomas, Reyer Zwiggelaar

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rachel RahmanDepartment of Psychology, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, UK.
Caitlin ReidDepartment of Psychology, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, UK.
Philip KloerHywel Dda University Health Board, St Davids Park, Jobswell Road, Carmarthen, UK.
Anna HenchieHywel Dda University Health Board, St Davids Park, Jobswell Road, Carmarthen, UK.
Andrew ThomasDepartment of Business and Management, Aberystwyth Business School, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, UK.
Reyer ZwiggelaarDepartment of Computer Science, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, UK.

Funding

Hywel Dda University Health Board
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollowing years of sustained pressure on the UK health service, there is recognition amongst health professionals and stakeholders that current models of healthcare are likely to be inadequate going forward. Therefore, a fundamental review of existing social models of healthcare is needed to ascertain current thinking in this area, and whether there is a need to change perspective on current thinking.

methodThrough a systematic research review, this paper seeks to address how previous literature has conceptualized a social model of healthcare and, how implementation of the models has been evaluated. Analysis and data were extracted from 222 publications and explored the country of origin, methodological approach, and the health and social care contexts which they were set.

resultsThe publications predominantly drawn from the USA, UK, Australia, Canada and Europe identified five themes namely: the lack of a clear and unified definition of a social model of health and wellbeing; the need to understand context; the need for cultural change; improved integration and collaboration towards a holistic and person-centred approach; measuring and evaluating the performance of a social model of health.

conclusionThe review identified a need for a clear definition of a social model of health and wellbeing. Furthermore, consideration is needed on how a model integrates with current models and whether it will act as a descriptive framework or, will be developed into an operational model. The review highlights the importance of engagement with users and partner organizations in the co-creation of a model of healthcare.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareCanadaEuropeHumansUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID38276894
PMCPMC11161159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.