ArticleToxics2024
Interlaboratory Study on Zebrafish in Toxicology: Systematic Evaluation of the Application of Zebrafish in Toxicology's (SEAZIT's) Evaluation of Developmental Toxicity.
Article in Toxics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- A screening strategy for identifying the developmental and reproductive toxicity potential of botanicals.Pharmaceutical biology · 2026Review
- Zebrafish behavioral assessment as a first-tier whole-organism NAM for developmental neurotoxicity: A multi-laboratory evaluation.Neurotoxicology · 2026Article
- Recommendations of the Polish Zebrafish Society on the use of the zebrafish (Acta biochimica Polonica · 2026Review
- Standardizing Exposure Media to Enhance the Rigor and Reproducibility of Zebrafish Embryo-Based Toxicity Assays.Environmental science & technology · 2025Article
- Baicalin mitigates alcoholic-associated liver disease via SOCS1-driven reprogramming of macrophages.Chinese medicine · 2025Article
- Methylene blue at recommended concentrations alters metabolism in early zebrafish development.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Review
- Zebrafish: A Cost-Effective Model for Enhanced Forensic Toxicology Capabilities in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.Cureus · 2024Review
- Aryl phosphate ester-induced pericardial edema in zebrafish embryos is influenced by the ionic composition of exposure media.Aquatic toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Embryonic zebrafish represent a useful test system to screen substances for their ability to perturb development. The exposure scenarios, endpoints captured, and data analysis vary among the laboratories who conduct screening. A lack of harmonization impedes the comparison of the substance potency and toxicity outcomes across laboratories and may hinder the broader adoption of this model for regulatory use. The Systematic Evaluation of the Application of Zebrafish in Toxicology (SEAZIT) initiative was developed to investigate the sources of variability in toxicity testing. This initiative involved an interlaboratory study to determine whether experimental parameters altered the developmental toxicity of a set of 42 substances (3 tested in duplicate) in three diverse laboratories. An initial dose-range-finding study using in-house protocols was followed by a definitive study using four experimental conditions: chorion-on and chorion-off using both static and static renewal exposures. We observed reasonable agreement across the three laboratories as 33 of 42 test substances (78.6%) had the same activity call. However, the differences in potency seen using variable in-house protocols emphasizes the importance of harmonization of the exposure variables under evaluation in the second phase of this study. The outcome of the Def will facilitate future practical discussions on harmonization within the zebrafish research community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.