Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38276665›Full record

ArticleVaccines2023

Development and Assessment of a Six-Item Index to Gauge Motivation to Receive COVID-19 Vaccination.

Brian Pedersen, Gretchen Thompson, Albert Yao Kouakou, Marie Mujinga, Samuel Nicholes, Andres Martinez, Sohail Agha, Katherine Thanel, Mariame Louise Ouattara, Dorgeles Gbeke and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Brian PedersenDepartment of Social and Behavior Change, FHI 360, Washington, DC 20009, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7134-8424
Gretchen ThompsonDepartment of Behavioral, Epidemiological and Clinical Sciences, FHI 360, Durham, NC 27701, USA.
Albert Yao KouakouIndependent Research Consultant, Abidjan 00225, Côte d'Ivoire.
Marie MujingaIndependent Research Consultant, Kinshasa 00243, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Samuel NicholesDepartment of Behavioral, Epidemiological and Clinical Sciences, FHI 360, Durham, NC 27701, USA.
Andres MartinezDepartment of Behavioral, Epidemiological and Clinical Sciences, FHI 360, Durham, NC 27701, USA.
Sohail AghaBehavior Design Lab, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Katherine ThanelDepartment of Social and Behavior Change, FHI 360, Washington, DC 20009, USA.
Mariame Louise OuattaraIndependent Research Consultant, Abidjan 00225, Côte d'Ivoire.
Dorgeles GbekeIndependent Research Consultant, Abidjan 00225, Côte d'Ivoire.
Holly M BurkeDepartment of Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn and Child Health, FHI 360, Durham, NC 27701, USA.
Family Health International 360 · USInstitut Universitaire d'Abidjan · CIStanford University · USUniversity of Kinshasa · CD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined the factors influencing vaccine uptake using the Fogg Behavioral Model (FBM) and validated a multi-dimensional index for measuring a key construct in the FBM, motivation, using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Cronbach's alpha. The research was conducted in Yopougon Est, Côte d'Ivoire, and Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo. We aimed to develop a motivation index for COVID-19 vaccination uptake informed by the FBM. The motivation index was developed and refined using interviews and cognitive testing, and then used in baseline and endline surveys to measure the motivation to uptake COVID-19 vaccination among 2173 respondents. The index was simplified to six items validated using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and demonstrated strong internal reliability with Cronbach's alphas of 0.89 for the baseline and 0.77 for the endline. The study's findings indicate that this motivation index is a valid tool for measuring motivation to receive COVID-19 vaccination, with potential applications in other vaccination campaigns. However, further testing in diverse settings is needed to enhance generalizability, including in rural areas. This research provides valuable insights for designing effective behavior change interventions to increase COVID-19 vaccination rates.

Indexed as

behavior change interventionsconfirmatory factor analysisCOVID-19 vaccinationdemand creationFogg Behavioral Modelmotivation indexvaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID38276665
PMCPMC10818755
OpenAlexW4390032894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.