Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38276565›Full record

ArticleNutrients2024

Belief That Caffeine Ingestion Improves Performance in a 6-Minute Time Trial Test without Affecting Pacing Strategy.

Fernando Valero, Fernando González-Mohíno, Juan José Salinero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fernando ValeroSport Training Lab, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 45071 Toledo, Spain.
Fernando González-MohínoSport Training Lab, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 45071 Toledo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6327-6958
Juan José SalineroSport Training Lab, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 45071 Toledo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4153-5100

Funding

Ministry of Science and Innovation, 2020 - «Proyectos de I+D+i» PID2020-119162GB-I00/AEI/10.13039/501100011033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the placebo effect associated with caffeine ingestion on running performance.

methodsThirteen recreationally trained males in long-distance running (age: 38.5 ± 11.9 years, 11.0 ± 8.8 years of running experience) performed a 6 min time trial test in each experimental condition (caffeine-informed/placebo ingested (placebo) and non-ingested (control)) separated by 7 days. The total distance covered was measured, and partial times of each 400 m were used to analyze the pacing strategy. Heart rate and kinematic variables were recorded for each split. In addition, the rate of perceived exertion and prevalence of caffeine side effects was measured using questionnaires.

resultsPlacebo ingestion improved running performance in the 6 min time trial test (1668 ± 139 m placebo vs. 1642 ± 158 m control, t = 2.49;

conclusionsBeliefs of caffeine ingestion can improve running performance at speeds around maximal aerobic speed in recreationally trained runners without affecting pacing strategy so this "nutritional" strategy could be useful in competition scenarios. As a practical application, recreationally trained runners could improve ≈5 s in 1500 m or mile competitions.

Indexed as

Athletic PerformanceRunningAdultCaffeineDouble-Blind MethodEatingHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedCaffeineergogenic aidsexpectancyplacebo effectrunning performance

Identifiers

PMID38276565
PMCPMC10819016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.