Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38276534›Full record

ReviewToxins2024

Practical Strategies to Reduce Ochratoxin A in Foods.

Hyun Jung Lee, Hae Dun Kim, Dojin Ryu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxins, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hyun Jung LeeDepartment of Animal, Veterinary and Food Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA.
Hae Dun KimDepartment of Animal, Veterinary and Food Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA.
Dojin RyuDivision of Food, Nutrition and Exercise Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3424-1163
University of Idaho · USUniversity of Missouri · US

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2016-67017-24418National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2019-67018-29688
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ochratoxin A (OTA), a potent nephrotoxin, is one of the most deleterious mycotoxins, with its prevalence in agricultural crops and their processed foods around the world. OTA is a major concern to food safety, as OTA exposure through dietary intake may lead to a significant level of accumulation in the body as a result of its long half-life (about 35 days). Its potent renal toxicity and high risk of exposure as well as the difficulty in controlling environmental factors OTA production has prompted the need for timely information on practical strategies for the food industry to effectively manage OTA contamination during food processing. The effects of various food processes, including both nonthermal and thermal methods, on the reduction in OTA were summarized in this review, with emphasis on the toxicity of residual OTA as well as its known and unknown degradation products. Since complete removal of OTA from foodstuffs is not feasible, additional strategies that may facilitate the reduction in OTA in food, such as adding baking soda and sugars, was also discussed, so that the industry may understand and apply practical measures to ensure the safety of its products destined for human consumption.

Indexed as

MycotoxinsOchratoxinsFood ContaminationFood SafetyHumansMycotoxinsochratoxin AOchratoxinsfood additivesfood processingochratoxin A (OTA)reductiontoxicity

Identifiers

PMID38276534
PMCPMC10819544
OpenAlexW4391099712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.