ArticlePharmaceutics2024
Effects of Aqueous Boundary Layers and Paracellular Transport on the Efflux Ratio as a Measure of Active Transport Across Cell Layers.
Article in Pharmaceutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biopharmaceutical Characterization of Grapiprant Within the BCS Framework Under Canine-Relevant Conditions: Solubility and Caco-2 Permeability Assessment.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Classifying Effluxable Versus Non-Effluxable Compounds Using a Permeability Threshold Based on Fundamental Energy Constraints.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Exploring the Bioavailability of Red Grape Skin Extract Polyphenols: A Caco-2 Cell Model Study.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The pH-dependence of efflux ratios determined with bidirectional transport assays across cellular monolayers.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2024Article
- Differing temperature dependencies of functional homologs zebrafish Abcb4 and human ABCB1.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The efflux ratio (ER), determined by Caco-2/MDCK assays, is the standard in vitro metric to establish qualitatively whether a compound is a substrate of an efflux transporter. However, others have also enabled the utilisation of this metric quantitatively by deriving a relationship that expresses the ER as a function of the intrinsic membrane permeability of the membrane (P0) as well as the permeability of carrier-mediated efflux (Ppgp). As of yet, Ppgp cannot be measured directly from transport experiments or otherwise, but the ER relationship provides easy access to this value if P0 is known. However, previous derivations of this relationship failed to consider the influence of additional transport resistances such as the aqueous boundary layers (ABLs) and the filter on which the monolayer is grown. Since single fluxes in either direction can be heavily affected by these experimental artefacts, it is crucial to consider the potential impact on the ER. We present a model that includes these factors and show both mathematically and experimentally that this simple ER relationship also holds for the more realistic scenario that does not neglect the ABLs/filter. Furthermore, we also show mathematically how paracellular transport affects the ER, and we experimentally confirm that paracellular dominance reduces the ER to unity and can mask potential efflux.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.