ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Using Diffraction Deep Neural Networks for Indirect Phase Recovery Based on Zernike Polynomials.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The phase recovery module is dedicated to acquiring phase distribution information within imaging systems, enabling the monitoring and adjustment of a system's performance. Traditional phase inversion techniques exhibit limitations, such as the speed of the sensor and complexity of the system. Therefore, we propose an indirect phase retrieval approach based on a diffraction neural network. By utilizing non-source diffraction through multiple layers of diffraction units, this approach reconstructs coefficients based on Zernike polynomials from incident beams with distorted phases, thereby indirectly synthesizing interference phases. Through network training and simulation testing, we validate the effectiveness of this approach, showcasing the trained network's capacity for single-order phase recognition and multi-order composite phase inversion. We conduct an analysis of the network's generalization and evaluate the impact of the network depth on the restoration accuracy. The test results reveal an average root mean square error of 0.086λ for phase inversion. This research provides new insights and methodologies for the development of the phase recovery component in adaptive optics systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.