Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38276350›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

The Push Forward in Rehabilitation: Validation of a Machine Learning Method for Detection of Wheelchair Propulsion Type.

Rienk van der Slikke, Arie-Willem de Leeuw, Aleid de Rooij, Monique Berger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Validation of an innovative algorithm for detecting self-propulsion in manual wheelchair users.Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rienk van der SlikkeFaculty of Health, Nutrition & Sport, The Hague University of Applied Sciences, 2521 EN The Hague, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3630-3519
Arie-Willem de LeeuwFaculty of Health, Nutrition & Sport, The Hague University of Applied Sciences, 2521 EN The Hague, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9857-0970
Aleid de RooijDepartment of Innovation, Quality and Research, Basalt Revalidatie, 2545 AA The Hague, The Netherlands.
Monique BergerFaculty of Health, Nutrition & Sport, The Hague University of Applied Sciences, 2521 EN The Hague, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2014-8817

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within rehabilitation, there is a great need for a simple method to monitor wheelchair use, especially whether it is active or passive. For this purpose, an existing measurement technique was extended with a method for detecting self- or attendant-pushed wheelchair propulsion. The aim of this study was to validate this new detection method by comparison with manual annotation of wheelchair use. Twenty-four amputation and stroke patients completed a semi-structured course of active and passive wheelchair use. Based on a machine learning approach, a method was developed that detected the type of movement. The machine learning method was trained based on the data of a single-wheel sensor as well as a setup using an additional sensor on the frame. The method showed high accuracy (F1 = 0.886, frame and wheel sensor) even if only a single wheel sensor was used (F1 = 0.827). The developed and validated measurement method is ideally suited to easily determine wheelchair use and the corresponding activity level of patients in rehabilitation.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord InjuriesWheelchairsBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansMovementinertial sensorrehabilitationwheelchair activity

Identifiers

PMID38276350
PMCPMC10821488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.