Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38276348›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

A 0.05 m Change in Inertial Measurement Unit Placement Alters Time and Frequency Domain Metrics during Running.

Dovin Kiernan, Zachary David Katzman, David A Hawkins, Blaine Andrew Christiansen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dovin KiernanBiomedical Engineering Graduate Group, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4479-3909
Zachary David KatzmanDepartment of Neurobiology, Physiology & Behavior, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-2838-0334
David A HawkinsBiomedical Engineering Graduate Group, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5930-9844
Blaine Andrew ChristiansenBiomedical Engineering Graduate Group, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

Funding

American College of Sports Medicine 18-00671Maury L Hull Endowed Fellowship for Musculoskeletal Biomechanics Research n/aNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council CGSD3-502358-2017Sigma Xi G2018031595024439University of California Davis Professors for the Future Fellowship n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inertial measurement units (IMUs) provide exciting opportunities to collect large volumes of running biomechanics data in the real world. IMU signals may, however, be affected by variation in the initial IMU placement or movement of the IMU during use. To quantify the effect that changing an IMU's location has on running data, a reference IMU was 'correctly' placed on the shank, pelvis, or sacrum of 74 participants. A second IMU was 'misplaced' 0.05 m away, simulating a 'worst-case' misplacement or movement. Participants ran over-ground while data were simultaneously recorded from the reference and misplaced IMUs. Differences were captured as root mean square errors (RMSEs) and differences in the absolute peak magnitudes and timings. RMSEs were ≤1 g and ~1 rad/s for all axes and misplacement conditions while mean differences in the peak magnitude and timing reached up to 2.45 g, 2.48 rad/s, and 9.68 ms (depending on the axis and direction of misplacement). To quantify the downstream effects of these differences, initial and terminal contact times and vertical ground reaction forces were derived from both the reference and misplaced IMU. Mean differences reached up to -10.08 ms for contact times and 95.06 N for forces. Finally, the behavior in the frequency domain revealed high coherence between the reference and misplaced IMUs (particularly at frequencies ≤~10 Hz). All differences tended to be exaggerated when data were analyzed using a wearable coordinate system instead of a segment coordinate system. Overall, these results highlight the potential errors that IMU placement and movement can introduce to running biomechanics data.

Indexed as

RunningBiomechanical PhenomenaGaitHumansLegMovementPelvisaccelerometersbiomechanicsgaitground reaction forcesgyroscopesin-fieldkinematicskineticslocomotionover-ground

Identifiers

PMID38276348
PMCPMC10820910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.