Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38276347›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Human Digital Twin in Industry 5.0: A Holistic Approach to Worker Safety and Well-Being through Advanced AI and Emotional Analytics.

Saul Davila-Gonzalez, Sergio Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Saul Davila-GonzalezEscuela Internacional de Doctorado, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0009-0007-9521-7331
Sergio MartinIndustrial Engineering Faculty, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4118-0234

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research introduces a conceptual framework designed to enhance worker safety and well-being in industrial environments, such as oil and gas construction plants, by leveraging Human Digital Twin (HDT) cutting-edge technologies and advanced artificial intelligence (AI) techniques. At its core, this study is in the developmental phase, aiming to create an integrated system that could enable real-time monitoring and analysis of the physical, mental, and emotional states of workers. It provides valuable insights into the impact of Digital Twins (DT) technology and its role in Industry 5.0. With the development of a chatbot trained as an empathic evaluator that analyses emotions expressed in written conversations using natural language processing (NLP); video logs capable of extracting emotions through facial expressions and speech analysis; and personality tests, this research intends to obtain a deeper understanding of workers' psychological characteristics and stress levels. This innovative approach might enable the identification of stress, anxiety, or other emotional factors that may affect worker safety. Whilst this study does not encompass a case study or an application in a real-world setting, it lays the groundwork for the future implementation of these technologies. The insights derived from this research are intended to inform the development of practical applications aimed at creating safer work environments.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEmotionsAnxietyEmpathyHumansSoftwareartificial intelligenceemotional well-beinghealth and safety environmentHuman Digital TwinIndustry 5.0Internet of Thingsmental healthphysiological health

Identifiers

PMID38276347
PMCPMC10818408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.