Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38276326›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Targeting Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Using a Supervised Machine Learning Approach Based on Mechanomyography.

Eira Lotta Spieker, Ardit Dvorani, Christina Salchow-Hömmen, Carolin Otto, Klemens Ruprecht, Nikolaus Wenger, Thomas Schauer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eira Lotta SpiekerDepartment of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0009-0000-7750-1469
Ardit DvoraniControl Systems Group, Technische Universität Berlin, Einsteinufer 17, 10587 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0009-0002-2765-8729
Christina Salchow-HömmenDepartment of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5527-9895
Carolin OttoDepartment of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9768-5143
Klemens RuprechtDepartment of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Nikolaus WengerDepartment of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0965-7530
Thomas SchauerControl Systems Group, Technische Universität Berlin, Einsteinufer 17, 10587 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0865-4418

Funding

German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) FKZ 13GW0486
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) provides a promising therapy option for individuals with injured spinal cords and multiple sclerosis patients with spasticity and gait deficits. Before the therapy, the examiner determines a suitable electrode position and stimulation current for a controlled application. For that, amplitude characteristics of posterior root muscle (PRM) responses in the electromyography (EMG) of the legs to double pulses are examined. This laborious procedure holds potential for simplification due to time-consuming skin preparation, sensor placement, and required expert knowledge. Here, we investigate mechanomyography (MMG) that employs accelerometers instead of EMGs to assess muscle activity. A supervised machine-learning classification approach was implemented to classify the acceleration data into no activity and muscular/reflex responses, considering the EMG responses as ground truth. The acceleration-based calibration procedure achieved a mean accuracy of up to 87% relative to the classical EMG approach as ground truth on a combined cohort of 11 healthy subjects and 11 patients. Based on this classification, the identified current amplitude for the tSCS therapy was in 85%, comparable to the EMG-based ground truth. In healthy subjects, where both therapy current and position have been identified, 91% of the outcome matched well with the EMG approach. We conclude that MMG has the potential to make the tuning of tSCS feasible in clinical practice and even in home use.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord InjuriesSpinal Cord StimulationElectromyographyHumansMuscle, SkeletalSpinal CordSupervised Machine Learningaccelerationmachine learningmechanomyography (MMG)multiple sclerosis (MS)spinal cord injury (SCI)supervised classificationtranscutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS)

Identifiers

PMID38276326
PMCPMC10818383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.