Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38276172›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2023

Direct Impact of the Air on Mutant Cells for Mutagenicity Assessments in Urban Environments.

Chiara Caredda, Elena Franchitti, Giorgio Gilli, Cristina Pignata, Deborah Traversi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 77% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chiara CareddaDepartment of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, piazza Polonia 94, 10126 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1525-1334
Elena FranchittiDepartment of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, piazza Polonia 94, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Giorgio GilliDepartment of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, piazza Polonia 94, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Cristina PignataDepartment of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, piazza Polonia 94, 10126 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7299-1358
Deborah TraversiDepartment of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, piazza Polonia 94, 10126 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7328-1339

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrban air pollution is recognized as a critical problem for public health and is classified as a carcinogen for humans. A great number of studies have focused on the monitoring of urban air mutagenicity. One of the best-known and applied methods for assessing mutagenicity is the Ames test, a bacterial reverse mutation test. The classic protocol for assessing air mutagenicity involves the concentration of particulate matter (PM) on filters and subsequent extraction using organic solvents. This work aimed to develop a method for the evaluation of air mutagenicity directly impacted by air on microbial plates already containing an Ames' microbial sensor.

methodsA specific six-month sampling campaign was carried out in Turin in a period with high air pollution. Samples were tested for mutagenicity on

resultsThe new protocol is able to evaluate the mutagenicity of the sampled air and obtain repeatable results. The final sensitivity is similar to the traditional method (≈10 net revertants/m

conclusionsDespite some critical issues in contamination control, the method is easier, faster, and less expensive than traditional methods.

Indexed as

air pollutionmutagenicitySalmonella assayurban environment

Identifiers

PMID38276172
PMCPMC10820087
OpenAlexW4389938672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.