Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38276141›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2024

Classification and Definitions of Compensatory Protective Step Strategies in Older Adults: A Scoping Review.

Maria Melo-Alonso, Alvaro Murillo-Garcia, Juan Luis Leon-Llamas, Santos Villafaina, Mari Carmen Gomez-Alvaro, Felipe Alejandro Morcillo-Parras, Narcis Gusi

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maria Melo-AlonsoPhysical Activity and Quality of Life Research Group (AFYCAV), Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte, Universidad de Extremadura, 10003 Caceres, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1434-6750
Alvaro Murillo-GarciaPhysical Activity and Quality of Life Research Group (AFYCAV), Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte, Universidad de Extremadura, 10003 Caceres, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0410-6051
Juan Luis Leon-LlamasPhysical Activity and Quality of Life Research Group (AFYCAV), Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte, Universidad de Extremadura, 10003 Caceres, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0757-5937
Santos VillafainaPhysical Activity and Quality of Life Research Group (AFYCAV), Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte, Universidad de Extremadura, 10003 Caceres, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0784-1753
Mari Carmen Gomez-AlvaroPhysical Activity and Quality of Life Research Group (AFYCAV), Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte, Universidad de Extremadura, 10003 Caceres, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7366-5738
Felipe Alejandro Morcillo-ParrasPhysical Activity and Quality of Life Research Group (AFYCAV), Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte, Universidad de Extremadura, 10003 Caceres, Spain.
Narcis GusiPhysical Activity and Quality of Life Research Group (AFYCAV), Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte, Universidad de Extremadura, 10003 Caceres, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1001-8883

Funding

Spanish Ministry of Sciences and Innovation PID2019-107191RB I00/AEI/10.13039/501100011033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe risk for an unexpected fall can be due to increasing age, health conditions, and loss of cognitive, sensory, or musculoskeletal functions. Falls have personal and economic consequences in many countries. Different disturbances can occur during gait, such as tripping, slipping, or other unexpected circumstances that can generate a loss of balance. The strategies used to recover balance depend on many factors, but selecting a correct response strategy influences the success of balance recovery.

objectives(1) To collect and clarify the definitions of compensatory protective step strategies to recover balance in older adults; (2) to identify the most used methods to induce loss of balance; and (3) to identify the most used spatiotemporal variables in analyzing these actions.

methodsThe present review has followed the PRISMA guideline extension for Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR) and the phases proposed by Askery and O'Malley. The search was conducted in three databases: PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus.

resultsA total of 525 articles were identified, and 53 studies were included. Forty-five articles were quasi-experimental studies, six articles were randomized controlled trials, and two studies had an observational design. In total, 12 compensatory protective step strategies have been identified.

conclusionsThere are 12 compensatory protective step strategies: lowering and elevating strategy, short- and long-step strategy, backward and forward stepping for slip, single step, multiple steps, lateral sidesteps or loaded leg sidestep unloaded leg sidestep, crossover step (behind and front), and medial sidestep. To standardize the terminology applied in future studies, we recommend collecting these strategies under the term of compensatory protective step strategies. The most used methods to induce loss of balance are the tether-release, trip, waist-pull, and slip methods. The variables analyzed by articles are the number of steps, the acceleration phase and deceleration phase, COM displacement, the step initiation or step duration, stance phase time, swing phase time and double-stance duration, stride length, step length, speed step, speed gait and the type of step.

Indexed as

elderlyfallsgaitmovementperturbationpostural balancestepping

Identifiers

PMID38276141
PMCPMC10816706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.