Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38276101›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2024

Comparing Survival Outcomes between Hemodialysis and Hemodiafiltration Using Real-World Data from Brazil.

Erica Pires da Rocha, Christiane Akemi Kojima, Luis Gustavo Modelli de Andrade, Daniel Monte Costa, Andrea Olivares Magalhaes, Whelington Figueiredo Rocha, Leonardo Nunes de Vasconcelos Junior, Maria Gabriela Rosa, Carolina Steller Wagner Martins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Latest Trends in Hemodiafiltration.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Erica Pires da RochaNefroStar Kidney Care, Osasco 06010-067, Brazil.
Christiane Akemi KojimaNefroStar Kidney Care, Osasco 06010-067, Brazil.
Luis Gustavo Modelli de AndradeDepartament of Internal Medicine, UNESP, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Sao Paulo 01049-010, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0230-0766
Daniel Monte CostaNefroStar Kidney Care, Osasco 06010-067, Brazil.
Andrea Olivares MagalhaesNefroStar Kidney Care, Osasco 06010-067, Brazil.
Whelington Figueiredo RochaNefroStar Kidney Care, Osasco 06010-067, Brazil.
Leonardo Nunes de Vasconcelos JuniorNefroStar Kidney Care, Osasco 06010-067, Brazil.
Maria Gabriela RosaNefroStar Kidney Care, Osasco 06010-067, Brazil.
Carolina Steller Wagner MartinsNefroStar Kidney Care, Osasco 06010-067, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8135-7439

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The CONVINCE trial demonstrates that high-dose hemodiafiltration offers a survival advantage for patients in the high-flux hemodiafiltration group compared to hemodialysis. We compared the outcomes of hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration using real-world data. We conducted an analysis on a cohort of patients who underwent hemodiafiltration therapy (HDF) at a single center, NefroStar Clinics. The results obtained were then compared with data from patients receiving hemodialysis (HD) therapy within the Brazilian Public Health System (SUS). The primary outcome was mortality from any cause. Results: A total of 85 patients undergoing hemodiafiltration were compared with 149,372 patients receiving hemodialysis through the Brazilian Public Health System (SUS). Using a 2:1 propensity score, we compared the 170 best-match HD patients with 85 HDF patients. In the Cox analysis, HDF therapy showed a reduced risk of mortality with an HR of 0.29 [0.11-0.77]. The propensity score analysis showed a HR of 0.32 [95% CI: 0.11-0.91]. This analysis was adjusted for age, type of access, KT/v, hemoglobin, and phosphorus. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed respective survival rates for HDF and HD at the end of one year, 92.1% and 79.9%,

Indexed as

chronichemodiafiltrationkidney failurereal word datarenal dialysistreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID38276101
PMCPMC10817062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.