Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38275771›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

Use of New Ultrasonography Methods for Detecting Neoplasms in Dogs and Cats: A Review.

Anna Carolina Mazeto Ercolin, Alex Silveira Uchôa, Luiz Paulo Nogueira Aires, Diego Rodrigues Gomes, Stefany Tagliatela Tinto, Giovanna Serpa Maciel Feliciano, Marcus Antônio Rossi Feliciano

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pioneering Advances in Veterinary Medicine: From Diagnosis to Treatment.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna Carolina Mazeto ErcolinLaboratory of Veterinary, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering, Sao Paulo University, Sao Paulo 13635-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5832-9015
Alex Silveira UchôaLaboratory of Veterinary, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering, Sao Paulo University, Sao Paulo 13635-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0838-2528
Luiz Paulo Nogueira AiresDepartment of Veterinary Clinic and Surgery, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Sao Paulo State University "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", Sao Paulo 14884-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3229-9396
Diego Rodrigues GomesLaboratory of Veterinary, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering, Sao Paulo University, Sao Paulo 13635-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2410-7123
Stefany Tagliatela TintoLaboratory of Veterinary, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering, Sao Paulo University, Sao Paulo 13635-900, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0001-9069-5111
Giovanna Serpa Maciel FelicianoLaboratory of Veterinary, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering, Sao Paulo University, Sao Paulo 13635-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3628-2989
Marcus Antônio Rossi FelicianoLaboratory of Veterinary, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering, Sao Paulo University, Sao Paulo 13635-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4373-6539
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this literature review was to present the novel imaging modalities elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. We provided an overview of the concepts and applications of each technique for the investigation of neoplastic and metastatic tumors in dogs and cats. Studies on elastography are based on the elasticity and deformation of the evaluated tissue. The information obtained from the different types of elastography can aid in the detection and differentiation of malignant and benign structures. Descriptions of elastography studies in several organs and tissue in veterinary medicine reported that, in general, malignant tumors tend to be more rigid and, therefore, less deformable than benign lesions or in comparison to the healthy parenchyma. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography is based on the intravenous injection of contrast media constituted by microbubbles. This imaging modality can be performed in nonsedated animals and provides information on the tissue perfusion, allowing the investigation of macro- and micro-circulation. Studies on different organs and tissues were performed in dogs and cats and revealed a tendency of malignant tumors to present faster transit of the contrast media (time to wash-in, peak and wash-out). These advanced techniques can be associated with other imaging modalities, aiding important information to the well-established exams of B-mode and Doppler ultrasonography. They can be used as screening tests, potentially representing an alternative to the invasive sampling methods required for cytological and histopathological analysis.

Indexed as

caninecontrast-enhanced ultrasoundelastographyfelinemetastasisneoplasia

Identifiers

PMID38275771
PMCPMC10812759
OpenAlexW4391027306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.