ReviewBiology2024
Looking Back, Going Forward: Understanding Cardiac Pathophysiology from Pressure-Volume Loops.
Review in Biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The effects of mechanical ventilation during v-a ecmo support: a systematic review.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Acute bi-ventricular haemodynamic changes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe aortic stenosis assessed using invasive pressure-volume loops.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Hemodynamic characterization of cardiac dysfunction after traumatic brain injury using a controlled cortical impact model in male rats.Physiological reports · 2026Article
- The impact of pericardial disruption on heart function and remodeling after myocardial infarction in mice.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Physiological characterization of pressure-strain loops indices as non-invasive surrogates for ventriculo-arterial coupling: a proof-of-concept study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Hemodynamic impact of acute liver injury on cardiac function: An in silico study via a closed-loop cardiovascular model.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Head Up Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Novel Physiological Discoveries and Latest Clinical Outcomes.Medical research archives · 2025Article
- Echocardiography in the Assessment of Heart Failure Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Intraoperative right ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume loop analysis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: A proof-of-concept methodology.JTCVS open · 2024Article
- Hemodynamics in Left-Sided Cardiomyopathies.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Cardiac Disease: The Fort Fell.Biomolecules · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Knowing cardiac physiology is essential for health care professionals working in the cardiovascular field. Pressure-volume loops (PVLs) offer a unique understanding of the myocardial working and have become pivotal in complex pathophysiological scenarios, such as profound cardiogenic shock or when mechanical circulatory supports are implemented. This review provides a comprehensive summary of the left and right ventricle physiology, based on the PVL interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.