ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Home Haemoglobin Monitoring for the Titration of Erythropoietin-Stimulating Agents in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Pragmatic Pilot Trial.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNo trials of POCT device pathways have been published in the field of anaemia of CKD. We describe the results of a year of use of a novel POCT device with its associated eHealth pathway in the home monitoring of ESA therapy, with the aim of evaluating device performance and pathway feasibility.
methodsWe used a POCT device designed for home self-testing, able to measure Hb from a drop of capillary blood (Luma, Entia, UK). Results were shared with HCPs via an associated mobile application. The pilot ran from August 2020 to March 2022 in a single UK renal centre. All adult non-dialysis-dependent-CKD patients on ESAs were eligible for inclusion. Participants were mailed the device and trained remotely. Participants were encouraged to self-test twice weekly for up to 1 year, with data collected on a pragmatic basis. Lab and Luma's results were compared.
resultsSeventeen participants returned comparable datasets (underwent ≥ 4 lab Hb measurements and self-tested for >5 months) with a mean testing frequency of 1.6 tests/wk. 1062 Luma and 113 lab Hb results were analysed. The coefficient of variation (CV) for raw results was 8.3% with a bias of -2.0% and SD 8.5. The percentage of Luma results differing by >10% lab results was 30.9%, dropping to 17.7% using an 8-point-moving-average. Participants stated they preferred Luma to traditional ESA monitoring and recommended the pathway to others.
conclusionOne year of home self-testing with Luma yielded comparable device utility to other POCT haematology analysers derived via HCP testing. Innovative pilot trials such as this form the basis for new empowering and home-based models of care required and desired by patients and HCPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.