Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38275457›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Biomimetic Study of a Honeycomb Energy Absorption Structure Based on Straw Micro-Porous Structure.

Shucai Xu, Nuo Chen, Haoyi Qin, Meng Zou, Jiafeng Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shucai XuState Key Laboratory of Intelligent Green Vehicle and Mobility, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Nuo ChenSuzhou Automobile Research Institute (Xiangcheng), Tsinghua University, Suzhou 215133, China.ORCID 0009-0002-5944-5226
Haoyi QinSuzhou Automobile Research Institute (Xiangcheng), Tsinghua University, Suzhou 215133, China.
Meng ZouKey Laboratory for Bionics Engineering of Education Ministry, Jilin University, Changchun 130022, China.
Jiafeng SongState Key Laboratory of Intelligent Green Vehicle and Mobility, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4288-6084

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 51405191National Natural Science Foundation of China 51775233Open Funding of Key Laboratory of Transportation Industry for Transport Vehicle Detection, Diagnosis and Maintenance Technology JTZL2102Opening Project of the Key Laboratory of Bionic Engineering (Ministry of Education), Jilin Uni-versity K202208Project funded by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2022M721901
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, sorghum and reed, which possess light stem structures in nature, were selected as biomimetic prototypes. Based on their mechanical stability characteristics-the porous structure at the node feature and the porous feature in the outer skin- biomimetic optimization design, simulation, and experimental research on both the traditional hexagonal structure and a hexagonal honeycomb structure were carried out. According to the two types of straw microcell and chamber structure characteristics, as well as the cellular energy absorption structure for the bionic optimization design, 22 honeycomb structures in 6 categories were considered, including a corrugated cell wall bionic design, a modular cell design, a reinforcement plate structure, and a self-similar structure, as well as a porous cell wall structure and gradient structures of variable wall thickness. Among them, HTPC-3 (a combined honeycomb structure), HSHT (a self-similar honeycomb structure), and HBCT-257 (a radial gradient variable wall thickness honeycomb structure) had the best performance: their energy absorption was 41.06%, 17.84%, and 83.59% higher than that of HHT (the traditional hexagonal honeycomb decoupling unit), respectively. Compared with HHT (a traditional hexagon honeycomb decoupling unit), the specific energy absorption was increased by 39.98%, 17.24%, and 26.61%, respectively. Verification test analysis revealed that the combined honeycomb structure performed the best and that its specific energy absorption was 22.82% higher than that of the traditional hexagonal structure.

Indexed as

bionic designenergy-absorbing structurehoneycomb structureporous structurestraw

Identifiers

PMID38275457
PMCPMC10813802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.