Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38275374›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2023

Changes in Cognitive Functions after Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Stenting: A Decade-Apart Comparison.

Daniel Václavík, David Pakizer, Tomáš Hrbáč, Martin Roubec, Václav Procházka, Tomáš Jonszta, Roman Herzig, David Školoudík

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Daniel VáclavíkDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic.
David PakizerCentre for Health Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Syllabova 19, 703 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-4160-9288
Tomáš HrbáčDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Ostrava, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Martin RoubecDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Václav ProcházkaDepartment of Radiodiagnostics, University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, 703 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-2410-2314
Tomáš JonsztaDepartment of Radiodiagnostics, University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, 703 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Roman HerzigComprehensive Stroke Centre, Department of Neurology, Charles University Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-7238-7724
David ŠkoloudíkDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study investigates changes in cognitive function in patients with severe carotid stenosis who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid stenting (CAS) over two decades.

methodsWe compared cognitive function within 30 days after the procedure in 267 patients (first 100 each for CEA and CAS in two periods: 2008-2012 and 2018-2022) in a single institution. Assessments used Adenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R), the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Speech Fluency Test (SFT), and Clock Drawing Test (CDT), conducted before and 30 ± 2 days after surgery.

resultsPatients (mean age 67.2 years, 70%+ carotid stenosis) exhibited different cognitive changes over periods. In 2008-2012, significant declines in MMSE (CEA,

conclusionOver a decade, advances in interventional techniques and patient management have reduced risks of cognitive decline in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis and also have improved cognitive functions in both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals.

Indexed as

carotid endarterectomycarotid stenosis

Identifiers

PMID38275374
PMCPMC10813376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.