ArticleCureus2023
Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Versus Palpatory Method of Posterior Tibial Artery Cannulation: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSuperficial arteries, such as radial and dorsalis pedis arteries, are commonly cannulated for invasive blood pressure monitoring. Failure to cannulate these arteries necessitates alternate arteries, such as the posterior tibial artery (PTA). The deep-seated anatomy of PTA makes arterial cannulation precarious by the palpatory technique. Ultrasound guidance during PTA cannulation may overcome this problem. With this background, we evaluated the ultrasound-guided (USG) versus palpatory method for PTA cannulation with respect to the first attempt's success and number of attempts.
methodsA total of 240 American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status I-IV adult patients undergoing major surgeries requiring arterial cannulation were randomly allocated (1:1) to group A (USG-guided cannulation, n = 120) and Group B (cannulation by palpatory technique, n =120). PTA was cannulated by either of the techniques according to randomization. Data were analyzed and compared in both groups for first-attempt success, number of attempts, assessment time, cannulation time, and complications.
resultThe successful cannulation in the first attempt in Group A was 25.8% (n = 31), and in Group B, it was 12.5% (n = 15) (p = 0.009). In Group A, 78.3% of patients (n = 94) had successful cannulation, and in group B, 65% of patients (n =78) had successful cannulation (p = 0.022). Both groups had similar assessment time (p = 0.348) and cannulation time (p = 0.864).
conclusionUSG-guided PTA cannulation offers a greater chance of success without any added increase in procedure time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.