Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38274909›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Dental Students' Perceptions Towards E-learning in Comparison With Traditional Classroom Learning.

Marwa Y Shaheen, Amani M Basudan, Abdulrahman M Almubarak, Abeer S Alzawawi, Fatemah M Al-Ahmari, Hajer A Aldulaijan, Hani Almoharib, Nahed Y Ashri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Romosozumab in older adults: real-world patterns in fracture liaison service cohort.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marwa Y ShaheenDepartment of Periodontics and Community Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Amani M BasudanDepartment of Periodontics and Community Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Abdulrahman M AlmubarakDepartment of Periodontics and Community Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Abeer S AlzawawiDepartment of Periodontics and Community Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Fatemah M Al-AhmariDepartment of Periodontics and Community Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Hajer A AldulaijanDepartment of Periodontics and Community Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Hani AlmoharibDepartment of Periodontics and Community Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Nahed Y AshriDepartment of Periodontics and Community Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionElectronic learning (e-learning) has evolved into a popular educational approach since the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. While this represents an additional model for teaching, traditional classroom learning fosters the development of interpersonal skills and enables students to share and discuss specific topics. However, existing research on the comparison of both these modes of learning in the field of dental education is inadequate. This study aimed to evaluate the perceptions of dental students towards both electronic and classroom learning.

methodsA cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey was conducted between November 2022 and January 2023 among dental students in Saudi Arabia. Students were questioned on their comparative perceptions of e-learning and classroom learning before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Questionnaire responses, including demographic data, were collected and tabulated, using electronic data management software. The tabulated data were analyzed to provide descriptive statistics and compare electronic and classroom learning with demographic variables and previous experience with e-learning.

resultsMost respondents reported possessing average information technology (IT) skills and prior experience with e-learning. Blackboard Learning Management System (LMS) (Reston, VA: Blackboard Inc.), Zoom (San Jose, CA: Zoom Video Communications Inc.), and Microsoft Teams (Redmond, WA: Microsoft Corporation) were the most commonly used and advantageous e-learning platforms. While the majority of participants found both methods acceptable for problem-based learning sessions and theoretical lectures, they reported e-learning to be less effective than classroom learning for clinical and practical sessions. Regarding e-learning as a preferred method over classroom learning, most responses were "neutral" or "uncertain." Comparing the mean ranks of the ordinal responses for the different teaching methodologies and the nominal responses for e-learning as the preferred method, no statistically significant interactions were observed for demographic characteristics, IT-skill levels, or prior experience with e-learning.

conclusionAlthough enhanced performance and learning capacity are enabled through e-learning, the advantages of personal interactions and the feasibility of practical and clinical dental sessions are achieved only through classroom learning.

Indexed as

classroom learningdental educationdental studentse-learningface-to-face learningonline learning

Identifiers

PMID38274909
PMCPMC10810565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.