ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023
Random forest algorithm for predicting postoperative delirium in older patients.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Machine learning models for predicting postoperative delirium in non-cardiac surgery patients - systematic review and meta-analysis.GeroScience · 2026Pooled it
- Machine Learning-Based prediction models for postoperative delirium: a systematic review and Meta-Analysis.BMC psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Establishment and validation of a machine learning-based prediction model for sepsis-induced coagulopathy.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Article
- Development of a Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model for Postoperative Delirium in Older Adult Intensive Care Unit Patients: Retrospective Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- A nomogram for predicting delirium in the ICU among older patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Multimodal Model for Delirium Risk Stratification.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Establishment and comparison of three fear of progression risk prediction models for gynecological malignancies patients based on machine learning.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Determining influences of intraoperative s-ketamine on postoperative delirium and cognitive function: methodology is important.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: In this study, we were aimed to identify important variables via machine learning algorithms and predict postoperative delirium (POD) occurrence in older patients. Methods: This study was to make the secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial. The Boruta function was used to screen relevant basic characteristic variables. Four models including Logistic Regression (LR), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), the Classification and Regression Tree (CART), and Random Forest (RF) were established from the data set using repeated cross validation, hyper-parameter optimization, and Smote technique (Synthetic minority over-sampling technique, Smote), with the calculation of confusion matrix parameters and the plotting of Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), Precision recall curve (PRC), and partial dependence graph for further analysis and evaluation. Results: The basic characteristic variables resulting from Boruta screening included grouping, preoperative Mini-Mental State Examination(MMSE), CHARLSON score, preoperative HCT, preoperative serum creatinine, intraoperative bleeding volume, intraoperative urine volume, anesthesia duration, operation duration, postoperative morphine dosage, intensive care unit (ICU) duration, tracheal intubation duration, and 7-day postoperative rest and move pain score (median and max; VAS-Rest-M, VAS-Move-M, VAS-Rest-Max, and VAS-Move-Max). And Random Forest (RF) showed the best performance in the testing set among the 4 models with Accuracy: 0.9878; Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC): 0.8763; Area under ROC curve (AUC-ROC): 1.0; Area under the PRC Curve (AUC-PRC): 1.0. Conclusion: A high-performance algorithm was established and verified in this study demonstrating the degree of POD risk changes in perioperative elderly patients. And the major risk factors for the development of POD were CREA and VAS-Move-Max.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.