Observational studyFrontiers in immunology2023
Rational use of eculizumab in secondary atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome.
Observational study in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emerging evidence of neutrophil extracellular traps in essential hypertension and target organ damage: pathophysiological insights and therapeutic implications.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Review
- Update in the diagnosis of complement-mediated thrombotic microangiopathy/atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025Review
- Influenza A H1N1 Triggering Complement-Mediated Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome.Journal of medical cases · 2025Article
- Hypertensive Emergency and Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Associated with Cocaine Use: A Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenge.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Associated with BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in a Kidney Transplant Recipient: A Case Report and Literature Review.Infectious disease reports · 2025Article
- Targeted Complement Treatments in Glomerulopathies: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Beyond the Norm: Gastroenteritis-Induced Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome in the Absence of Complement Dysfunction.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Secondary atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (secondary aHUS) is a heterogeneous group of thrombotic microangiopathies (TMA) associated with various underlying conditions. Unlike primary aHUS, there is still no hard evidence on the efficacy of complement blockade in secondary aHUS, since the two main series that investigated this subject showed discrepant results. Our work aims to reassess the efficacy of eculizumab in treating secondary aHUS. Methods: Observational, retrospective, single-center study, in which we analyzed the hematological and renal evolution of 23 patients diagnosed with secondary aHUS who received treatment with eculizumab and compared them with a control cohort of 14 patients. Complete renal response was defined as the recovery of renal function before the event, partial renal response as a recovery of 50% of lost glomerular filtration rate, and hematological response as normalization of hemoglobin and platelets. Results: We found no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics or disease severity between both groups. After a median of 5 doses of eculizumab, the group of patients who received complement blockade presented a significant difference in renal response (complete in 52.3% of patients and partial in 23.8%) compared to the control cohort (complete response 14.3% and partial of 14.3%). Rates of hematological remission were similar in both groups (90.9% in the eculizumab cohort and 85.7% in the control cohort). Conclusion: Early and short-term use of eculizumab in patients with secondary aHUS could be an effective and safe therapeutic option, assuring better renal recovery compared to patients who do not receive complement blockade.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.