ArticleMethodsX2024
Validation of causal inference data using DirectLiNGAM in an environmental small-scale model and calculation settings.
Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Maternal administration of octanoate, a medium-chain fatty acid, improves feed efficiency of Japanese black calves through influencing gut bacteriome structure.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Causal estimation of the relationship between reproductive performance and the fecal bacteriome in cattle.Animal microbiome · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of data science has been needed in environmental fields such as marine, weather, and soil data. In general, the datasets are large in some cases, but they are often small because they contain observation data that the analyses themselves are limited. In such a case, the data are statistically evaluated by increasing or decreasing the levels of factors using differential analysis, resulting in the essential factors are estimated. However, there is no consistent approach to the means of assessing strong associations as a group between factors. Causal inference method has the possibility to output effective results for small data, and the results are expected to provide important information for understanding the potential highly association between factors, not necessarily the inference with big data. Here, we describe essential checkpoints and settings for the calculation by a direct method for learning a linear non-Gaussian structural equation model (DirectLiNGAM) and validation methods for the calculation results by using DirectLiNGAM with small-scale model data as an additional discussion of DirectLiNGAM portion of the related research article. Thus, this study provides the statistical validation methods for the association networks, treatments, and interventions for structural inference as a group of essential factors.•Causal inference with DirectLiNGAM•Validation of correlation coefficient and feature importance•Validation using causal effect object and propensity scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.