Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38274699›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2024

Construction of a geographically weighted nonparametric regression model fit test.

Lilis Laome, I Nyoman Budiantara, Vita Ratnasari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lilis LaomeInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya 60111 Indonesia.
I Nyoman BudiantaraInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya 60111 Indonesia.
Vita RatnasariInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya 60111 Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the approach of Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) models is the Geographically Weighted Nonparametric Regression (GWNR) has more parameters than the GWR model. Models with more parameters usually have better match values, which is an advantage, while models with fewer parameters have the advantage of being easier to use and interpret. However, a model with more parameters should be used if it is proven to be significantly superior. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop a hypothesis test of goodness of fit test for GWNR model. The goodness of fit test was performed for the real data. We found that the GWNR model was more suitable than the mixed nonparametric regression model. Some highlights of the proposed method are:•A new model for GWR to overcome the unknown regression function by using mixed estimator spline truncated and fourier series at nonparametric regression•Goodness of fit for GWNR to testing the model fit between the mixed nonparametric regression model and GWNR•Applied goodness of fit test to poverty data in Sulawesi Island and infant mortality in East Java.

Indexed as

Geographically Weighted Nonparametric Regression (GWNR)Goodness of fit testGWNRInfant DeathPoverty

Identifiers

PMID38274699
PMCPMC10809125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.