Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38274670›Full record

ArticleHealth policy OPEN2024

Planning with a gender lens: A gender analysis of pandemic preparedness plans from eight countries in Africa.

Beverley M Essue, Lydia Kapiriri, Hodan Mohamud, Marcela Claudia Veléz, Suzanne Kiwanuka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy OPEN, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Beverley M EssueInstitute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, 155 College Street, West Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada.
Lydia KapiririMcMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Kenneth Taylor Hall Room 226, Hamilton, Ontario Postal Code L8S 4M4, Canada.
Hodan MohamudInstitute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, 155 College Street, West Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada.
Marcela Claudia VelézMcMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Kenneth Taylor Hall Room 226, Hamilton, Ontario Postal Code L8S 4M4, Canada.
Suzanne KiwanukaDepartment of Health Policy Planning and Management, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Uganda.
McMaster University · CAMakerere University · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Health planning and priority setting with a gender lens can help to anticipate and mitigate vulnerabilities that women and girls may experience in health systems, which is especially relevant during health emergencies. This study examined how gender considerations were accounted for in COVID-19 pandemic response planning in a subset of countries in Africa. Methods: Multi-country document review of national pandemic response plans (published before July 2020 and as of March 2022) from Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, Rwanda, South Africa, Uganda, and Zambia, supplemented with secondary data on gender representation on planning committees. A gender analysis framework informed the study design and the Morgan et al. matrix guided data extraction and analysis. Results: All plans reflected implicit and explicit considerations of the impacts of the pandemic responses on women and girls. Through a gender lens, the implicit considerations focused on ensuring safety and protections (e.g., training, access to personal protective equipment) for community and facility-based health care workers and broad engagement of the community in risk communication. The explicit gender considerations, reflected in a minority of plans, focused on addressing gender-based violence and providing access to essential services (e.g., sexual and reproductive health care, psychosocial supports), products (e.g., menstrual hygiene products) and social protection measures. Women were underrepresented on the COVID-19 planning committees in all countries. Conclusions: The plans reflected varying national efforts to develop pandemic responses that anticipated and reflected unique vulnerabilities faced by women, though subsequent plans reflected further consideration of gender-relevant impacts compared to initial plans. Embedding a gender lens in emergency preparedness planning furthers equity and could support anticipation and timely mitigation of negative outcomes for women and girls who are often further marginalized during health emergencies.

Indexed as

COVID-19EquityGenderGender analysisPandemic preparedness planning

Identifiers

PMID38274670
PMCPMC10809111
OpenAlexW4389616971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.