Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38274667›Full record

ArticleIndia HCI 2021 : proceedings of the 12th Indian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction : 19th-21st November, 2021. Indian Conference on Human Computer Interaction (12th : 2021 : Online)2021

Experiences with the Introduction of AI-based Tools for Moderation Automation of Voice-based Participatory Media Forum.

Aman Khullar, Paramita Panjal, Rachit Pandey, Abhishek Burnwal, Prashit Raj, Ankit Akash Jha, Priyadarshi Hitesh, R Jayanth Reddy, Himanshu, Aaditeshwar Seth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in India HCI 2021 : proceedings of the 12th Indian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction : 19th-21st November, 2021. Indian Conference on Human Computer Interaction (12th : 2021 : Online), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Aman KhullarGram Vaani, India.
Paramita PanjalGram Vaani, India.
Rachit PandeyGram Vaani, India.
Abhishek BurnwalIIT Delhi, India.
Prashit RajIIT Delhi, India.
Ankit Akash JhaIIT Delhi, India.
Priyadarshi HiteshIIT Delhi, India.
R Jayanth ReddyIIT Delhi, India.
HimanshuIIT Delhi, India.
Aaditeshwar SethGram Vaani, IIT Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Voice-based discussion forums where users can record audio messages which are then published for other users to listen and comment, are often moderated to ensure that the published audios are of good quality, relevant, and adhere to editorial guidelines of the forum. There is room for the introduction of AI-based tools in the moderation process, such as to identify and filter out blank or noisy audios, use speech recognition to transcribe the voice messages in text, and use natural language processing techniques to extract relevant metadata from the audio transcripts. We design such tools and deploy them within a social enterprise working in India that runs several voice-based discussion forums. We present our findings in terms of the time and cost-savings made through the introduction of these tools, and describe the feedback of the moderators towards the acceptability of AI-based automation in their workflow. Our work forms a case-study in the use of AI for automation of several routine tasks, and can be especially relevant for other researchers and practitioners involved with the use of voice-based technologies in developing regions of the world.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceautomationcontent moderationInteractive Voice Response systems

Identifiers

PMID38274667
PMCPMC10810263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.