ArticleCureus2024
A Cadaveric Study on the High Origin of the Radial Artery.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on 'Risk Factors Influencing Recurrence Rates Following Open Excision of Wrist Ganglion Cysts: A Retrospective Cohort Study'.Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni · 2026Article
- When Neurological Symptoms Hide a Life-Threatening Hemorrhage: A Case Report of Diagnostic Challenges and Management of Hemorrhagic Shock From an Aberrant Radial Artery.The American journal of case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAmong the upper limb's vascular variations, the radial artery's high origin from the axillary artery is rare, and literature regarding the same is limited. Anomalous origin of radial artery can cause failure of radial approach to coronary angiography and reconstructive surgeries of upper limbs and hence is of clinical significance. With this background, the current cadaveric study was planned to describe the branching pattern of the axillary artery and its variations.
methodsWe conducted this descriptive, cross-sectional study on sixty adult human cadaveric upper limbs at the anatomy departments of Government TD Medical College, Alappuzha, and Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, over two years from 2021 to 2023. The axillary artery's branching pattern and termination were noted, and the prevalence of high origin of the radial artery from the axillary artery was documented.
resultsHigh origin of radial artery from axillary artery was observed in four (6.70%) limbs and was higher than the prevalence reported in earlier literature. Among these variations, one was a female cadaver with a bilateral high origin of radial artery arising from the third part of the axillary artery. The other two were from separate male upper limbs, both from the right upper limb.
conclusionThe prevalence of the high origin of the radial artery from the axillary artery was high compared to earlier reported literature. This calls for further research in the anatomy of arterial patterns of the upper limb to avoid complications during arterial procedures of the upper limb.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.