ArticlePulmonary circulation2024
Pulmonary hypertension patient perspectives toward pulmonary rehabilitation.
Article in Pulmonary circulation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Pulmonary hypertension patient perspectives toward pulmonary rehabilitation.Pulmonary circulation · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a supervised exercise program for patients with chronic lung disease. Among patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH), PR has been shown to improve both quality of life and exercise capacity. The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of PR participation among PH patients, patient perspectives regarding PR, and to identify potential barriers to PR participation. We performed a cross-sectional survey of patients with self-reported PH who attended the Pulmonary Hypertension Association (PHA) conference in June 2022 in Atlanta, Georgia, and patients within the PHA listserv. A total of 429 participants completed the survey and were enrolled in the study. The average age of participants was 61 ± 14 years with 83% of participants identifying as female, 51% of patients self-reported as having group 1 PH. Among patients who completed the survey, 41% had previously attended a PR program. Of those who had completed a PR program, 83% reported being satisfied or very satisfied with the program and 86% reported that they would recommend PR to other PH patients. After completion of a PR program, 76% of patients reported an improvement in their quality of life and 88% reported improvement in exercise capacity. Among the patients who had not previously participated in PR (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.