Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38274552›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2024

Do Oral Cholera Vaccine and Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Combine to Provide Greater Protection Against Cholera? Results From a Cluster-Randomized Trial of Oral Cholera Vaccine in Kolkata, India.

Justin Im, Md Taufiqul Islam, Faisal Ahmmed, Deok Ryun Kim, Birkneh Tilahun Tadesse, Sophie Kang, Farhana Khanam, Fahima Chowdhury, Tasnuva Ahmed, Md Golam Firoj and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 3 institutions in 7 countries.

Justin ImInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3762-084X
Md Taufiqul IslamInternational Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Faisal AhmmedInternational Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Deok Ryun KimInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Birkneh Tilahun TadesseInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sophie KangInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Farhana KhanamInternational Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4158-5995
Fahima ChowdhuryInternational Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Tasnuva AhmedInternational Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Md Golam FirojInternational Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Asma Binte AzizInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0203-5744
Masuma HoqueInternational Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Hyon Jin JeonInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Suman KanungoICMR-National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Kolkata, India.
Shanta DuttaICMR-National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Kolkata, India.
Khalequ ZamanInternational Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Ashraful Islam KhanInternational Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Florian MarksInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6043-7170
Jerome H KimInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Firdausi QadriInternational Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
John D ClemensInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BDInternational Vaccine Institute · KRNational Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Oral cholera vaccine (OCV) and incremental improvements in household water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) within cholera-endemic areas can reduce cholera risk. However, we lack empiric evaluation of their combined impact. Methods: We evaluated a cluster-randomized, placebo-controlled trial of OCV (Shanchol) in Kolkata, India. The study population included 108 777 individuals, and 106 879 nonpregnant individuals >1 year of age were eligible to receive 2 doses of OCV or placebo. We measured cholera risk in all household members assigned to OCV vs placebo and in all members of households with "Better" vs "Not Better" WASH, where WASH was classified according to validated criteria. Protection was measured by Cox proportional hazard models. Results: Residence in an OCV household was associated with protective effectiveness (PE) of 54% (95% CI, 42%-64%; Conclusions: These findings suggest that the combination of a vaccine policy and improved WASH reduces cholera risk more than either would alone, although the magnitude of either intervention was not affected by the other. Future randomized trials investigating OCV and WASH interventions separately and together are recommended to further understand the interaction between OCV and WASH.

Indexed as

choleraclinical trialIndiaoral cholera vaccine (OCV)WASH

Identifiers

PMID38274552
PMCPMC10810060
OpenAlexW4390690549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.