Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38274527›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of patients with recurrent pregnancy loss toward pregnancy loss.

Fangxiang Mu, Tianyu He, Kexin Wang, Fang Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mobile Internet Use and Obesity Among Chinese Adults.Journal of prevention (2022) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fangxiang MuDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
Tianyu HeDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
Kexin WangDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
Fang WangDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Self-management is crucial in managing recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). This study explored the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of patients with RPL toward RPL. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among patients with RPL between January 2023 and June 2023 at the Second Hospital of Lanzhou University. Participants' demographic characteristics and KAP were determined using a self-designed questionnaire (Cronbach's α = 0.818). Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to observe the correlations among KAP and different factors. Results: This study analyzed 497 valid questionnaires. The mean knowledge, attitude, and practice scores were 11.59 ± 4.30 (possible range: 0-20, 57.95%), 44.17 ± 3.18 (possible range: 13-65, 67.95%), and 32.39 ± 5.22 (possible range: 8-40, 80.98%), indicating poor knowledge, moderate attitude, and proactive practice. Age was non-linearly associated with the KAP dimensions, with a positive impact of age on KAP among those aged <32 years old. Knowledge was directly influenced by education (β = 1.49, Conclusion: Women with RPL in Lanzhou show poor knowledge, moderate attitude, and proactive practice toward RPL. This study identified specific KAP items that would require improvements. The study also identified categories of patients who would need more attention.

Indexed as

Abortion, HabitualHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEducational StatusFemaleHumansPregnancySurveys and Questionnairesattitudecross-sectional studyknowledgepracticesrecurrent pregnancy loss

Identifiers

PMID38274527
PMCPMC10808478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.