Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38274468›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2023

An analysis of Pompe newborn screening data: a new prevalence at birth, insight and discussion.

Ryan Colburn, David Lapidus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Impact of data sources and ascertainment methods on reporting paediatric genetic condition prevalence: A scoping review.Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Neonatal systemic gene therapy restores cardiorespiratory function in a rat model of Pompe disease.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Article
  16. Current clinical applications of AAV-mediated gene therapy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Neurological glycogen storage diseases and emerging therapeutics.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ryan Colburnodimm inc., Los Angeles, CA, United States.
David LapidusLapidusData Inc., Oklahoma City, OK, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study includes over 11.6M newborns screened (NBS) for Pompe Disease (PD) from 29 distinct universal screening programs across 8 countries and 4 continents. The birth prevalence of PD is 1:18,711, with no evidence of difference across populations of European, Latin American, or Asian ancestry, though differences may exist for PD subtypes. This study also compares these results, based on direct detection of disease and analyzed using a binomial method along with power analysis, with other methods for estimating the 'frequency' of rare genetic diseases (such as utilizing Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium on allele frequency and confidence interval analysis). This comparison demonstrates the implications of sample size and frames a discussion on its influence on the reliability of results when extrapolating to a population beyond the study dataset. Objectives: Primary: Establish a new figure for prevalence at birth for Pompe disease by collecting and analyzing the largest relevant dataset to date and using that result to project population prevalence at birth in a novel way. Secondary: Compare these results to previous analyses to offer a framework for evaluating 'frequency' data that can be applied to other rare, genetic diseases, along with methods to assess quality of estimates.

Indexed as

autosomal recessive inheritancediagnosis/diagnostic yieldgenetic prevalencegnomADlysosomal storage disorder/disease (LSD)newborn screening (NBS)Pompe (glycogen storage disease type 2/II)rare disease epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID38274468
PMCPMC10810242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.