Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38274435›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2023

EMDR treatment for people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review about difficulties and adaptations.

Simone M Schipper-Eindhoven, Nanda C de Knegt, Liesbeth Mevissen, Jos van Loon, Ralph de Vries, Majlinda Zhuniq, Marrie H J Bekker

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Proposed Framework for the Psychological Treatment of Munchausen by Proxy Survivors.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Simone M Schipper-EindhovenZodiak, Prinsenstichting, Purmerend, Netherlands.
Nanda C de KnegtZodiak, Prinsenstichting, Purmerend, Netherlands.
Liesbeth MevissenPsychotrauma Practice, Rha, Netherlands.
Jos van LoonDepartment of Special Needs Education, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Ralph de VriesVrije Universiteit, Medical Library, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Majlinda ZhuniqDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Biological Psychology, and Psychotherapy, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Marrie H J BekkerDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLArq Psychotrauma Expert Group · NLGhent University · BEUniversity of Mannheim · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: People with intellectual disabilities (ID) are at increased risk for developing Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Emerging evidence indicates that Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) therapy is feasible and potentially effective for this group. However, communication, cognition, stress regulation, and attachment difficulties may interfere with the EMDR process. Adaptation of the EMDR protocol seems therefore required for this population. Aim: This review aims to systematically identify and categorize the difficulties in applying EMDR to people with ID and the adaptations made by therapists to overcome these challenges. Methods: A literature search was performed in May 2023. Article selection was based on inclusion and exclusion criteria and quality appraisal. Results: After screening, 13 articles remained for further review. The identified difficulties and adaptations were categorized into the three domains of adaptive functioning (i.e., conceptual, social, and practical functioning). Considerable difficulties in applying the EMDR protocol for this group were reported. The adaptations made by therapists to overcome these difficulties were highly variable. They could be divided into three main categories: adaptions in EMDR delivery (e.g., tuning to the developmental level of the client, simplifying language, decreasing pace), involvement of others (e.g., involving family or support staff during or in between sessions), and the therapeutic relationship (e.g., taking more time, supportive attitude). Discussion: The variability of the number of mentioned difficulties and adaptations per study seems to be partly related to the specific EMDR protocol that was used. In particular, when the Shapiro adult protocol was administered, relatively more detailed difficulties and adaptations were described than in publications based on derived existing versions of an EMDR protocol for children and adolescents. A probable explanation is that already embedded modifications in these protocols facilitate the needed attunement to the client's level of functioning. Practical implications: The authors of this review suggest that EMDR protocols for children and adolescents could be adapted for people with an intellectual disability. Further research should focus on the involvement of trusted others in EMDR therapy for people with ID and the therapeutic relationship from an attachment and relational-based perspective.

Indexed as

EMDReye movement desensitization and reprocessingIDintellectual disabilitiespost-traumatic stress disorderPTSDtrauma

Identifiers

PMID38274435
PMCPMC10808451
OpenAlexW4390743973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.