Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38274423›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2023

Transcranial alternating current stimulation for schizophrenia: a systematic review of randomized controlled studies.

Xin Wei, Zhan-Ming Shi, Xian-Jun Lan, Zhen-Juan Qin, Yu Mo, Hua-Wang Wu, Xing-Bing Huang, Qing-Bin Zeng, Li-Xia Luo, Xin-Hu Yang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Xin WeiThe Brain Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, LiuZhou, China.
Zhan-Ming ShiChongqing Jiangbei Mental Health Center, Chongqing, China.
Xian-Jun LanThe Brain Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, LiuZhou, China.
Zhen-Juan QinThe Brain Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, LiuZhou, China.
Yu MoThe Brain Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, LiuZhou, China.
Hua-Wang WuThe Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xing-Bing HuangThe Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Qing-Bin ZengThe Third People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Li-Xia LuoChongqing Mental Health Center, Chongqing, China.
Xin-Hu YangThe Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Wei ZhengThe Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Brain Hospital · CNGuangzhou Medical University · CNChongqing City Mental Health Center · CNFirst People's Hospital of Foshan · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In randomized clinical trials (RCTs) investigating the application of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) in schizophrenia, inconsistent results have been reported. The purpose of this exploratory systematic review of RCTs was to evaluate tACS as an adjunct treatment for patients with schizophrenia based on its therapeutic effects, tolerability, and safety. Methods: Our analysis included RCTs that evaluated adjunctive tACS' effectiveness, tolerability, and safety in schizophrenia patients. Three independent authors extracted data and synthesized it using RevMan 5.3 software. Results: Three RCTs involving 76 patients with schizophrenia were encompassed in the analysis, with 40 participants receiving active tACS and 36 receiving sham tACS. Our study revealed a significant superiority of active tACS over sham tACS in improving total psychopathology (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.12, -0.10; Conclusion: Adjunctive tACS is promising as a viable approach for mitigating total and negative psychopathology in individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia. However, to gain a more comprehensive understanding of tACS's therapeutic effects in schizophrenia, it is imperative to conduct extensive, meticulously planned, and well-documented RCTs.

Indexed as

negative symptomsrandomized clinical trialschizophreniasystematic reviewtranscranial alternating current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID38274423
PMCPMC10808327
OpenAlexW4390745909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.