Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38274409›Full record

Trial reportJournal of pain research2024

Treating Chronic, Intractable Pain with a Miniaturized Spinal Cord Stimulation System: 1-Year Outcomes from the AUS-nPower Study During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

John Salmon, Daniel Bates, Neels Du Toit, Paul Verrills, James Yu, Murray G Taverner, Vahid Mohabbati, Matthew Green, Gary Heit, Robert Levy and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readCase ReportsClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of pain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

John SalmonPain Management, Pain Care Perth, Perth Cottesloe, WA, Australia.
Daniel BatesPain Management, Metro Pain Group, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Neels Du ToitPain Management, Metro Pain Group, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Paul VerrillsPain Management, Metro Pain Group, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
James YuPain Management, Sydney Spine and Pain, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Murray G TavernerPain Management, Frankston Pain Management, Frankston, VIC, Australia.
Vahid MohabbatiPain Management, Sydney Pain Management Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Matthew GreenPain Management, Pain Medicine of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Gary HeitDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue, Vietnam.
Robert LevyNeurosurgery, Institute for Neuromodulation, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
Peter StaatsPremier Pain Centers, Shrewsbury, NJ, USA.
Shilpa KottalgiClinical Department, Nalu Medical, Inc, Carlsbad, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6686-3587
James MakousMakous Research, LLC, Carlsbad, CA, USA.
Bruce MitchellPain Management, Metro Pain Group, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Metro South Health · AUAustralian Pain Society · AUFrankston Hospital · AUHue University · VNInternational Neuromodulation Society · USPain Management Centers Of America · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a highly effective treatment for chronic neuropathic pain. Despite recent advances in technology, treatment gaps remain. A small SCS system with a miniaturized implantable pulse generator (micro-IPG; <1.5 cm Patients and Methods: This was a prospective, multi-center, open-label, single-arm study to evaluate this SCS system, in the treatment of chronic, intractable leg and low-back pain. Consented subjects who passed screening continued on to the long-term phase of the study. One-year, patient-reported outcomes (PRO's) such as pain (Numeric Rating Scale, NRS), functional disability, quality of life, and mood were captured. Results: Twenty-six (26) evaluable subjects with permanent implants were included in this analysis. The average leg pain NRS score decreased from 6.8 ± 1.2 at baseline to 1.1 ± 1.2 at the end of the study (p < 0.001), while the average low-back pain NRS score decreased from 6.8 ± 1.2 to 1.5 ± 1.2 (p < 0.001). The responder rate (proportion with ≥50% pain relief) was 91% in the leg(s) and 82% in the low back. There were significant improvements in functional disability (Oswestry Disability Index) and in mood (Beck Depression Inventory), demonstrating a 46% and 62% improvement, respectively (p < 0.001). Eleven-point Likert scales demonstrated the wearable to be very comfortable and very easy to use. Conclusion: There were considerable challenges conducting a clinical study during the COVID-19 pandemic, such as missed study programming visits. Nevertheless, subjects had significant PRO improvements through 1-year. The small size of the implanted device, along with a proprietary waveform, may allow for improved SCS outcomes and a drop in incidence of IPG-pocket pain.

Indexed as

battery freefailed back surgery syndromeFBSSimplantable pulse generatorIPGmicro-IPGneuropathic painpersistent spinal pain syndromepulsed stimulation pattern

Identifiers

PMID38274409
PMCPMC10809818
OpenAlexW4391051609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.