Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38274398›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of hepatology2024

The Use of Noninvasive Velacur® for Discriminating between Volunteers and Patients with Chronic Liver Disease: A Feasibility Study.

Michael P Curry, Edward Tam, Caitlin Schneider, Noha Abdelgelil, Tarek Hassanien, Nezam H Afdhal

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of hepatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03957070 (The Sonic Incytes Liver Incyte System, Assessment of Liver Fibrosis and Steatosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03957070 nacompletednot on this map

The Sonic Incytes Liver Incyte System, Assessment of Liver Fibrosis and Steatosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorSonic IncytesRan2019 to 2021Enrolled140ConditionsLiver Fibrosis, Liver SteatosisArmsLiver Incyte
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael P CurryDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Nutrition, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2110-3503
Edward TamPacific Gastroenterology Associates, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8306-3968
Caitlin SchneiderSonic Incytes Medical Corp., Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6649-3790
Noha AbdelgelilSouthern California Research Center, Coronado, CA, USA.
Tarek HassanienSouthern California Research Center, Coronado, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9157-0329
Nezam H AfdhalDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Nutrition, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7342-6593
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USSouthern California Reproductive Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is the leading cause of chronic liver disease globally and can progress to cirrhosis, liver failure, and liver cancer. Current AASLD, AGA, and ADA guidelines recommend assessment for liver fibrosis in all patients with NAFLD. Serum biomarkers for fibrosis, while widely available, have notable limitations. Imaging-based noninvasive testing for liver fibrosis/cirrhosis is more accurate and is becoming more widespread. Methods: We evaluated the feasibility of a novel shear wave absolute vibroelastography (S-WAVE) modality called Velacur® for assessing liver stiffness measurement (LSM) for fibrosis and attenuation coefficient estimation (ACE) in differentiating patients with chronic liver disease from normal healthy controls. Results: Fifty-four healthy controls and 89 patients with NAFLD or cured HCV with a prior known LSM of >8 kPa were enrolled, and all subjects were evaluated with FibroScan® and Velacur®. Velacur® was able to discriminate patients with increased liver stiffness as determined by a FibroScan® score of >8 kPa from healthy controls with an AUC of 0.938 (0.88-0.96). For assessment of steatosis in NAFLD patients only, Velacur® could identify patients with steatosis from healthy controls with an AUC of 0.831 (0.777-0.880). The Velacur® scan quality assessment was superior in healthy controls, as compared to patients, and the scan quality, as assessed by the quality factor (QF) and interquartile range (IQR)/median, was affected by BMI. Velacur® was safe and well tolerated by patients, and there were no adverse events. Conclusion: Velacur® assessment of liver stiffness measurement and liver attenuation is comparable to results obtained by FibroScan® and is an alternative technology for monitoring liver fibrosis progression in patients with chronic liver disease. This trial is registered with NCT03957070.

Identifiers

PMID38274398
PMCPMC10807935
OpenAlexW4390939748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.