Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38274351›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2023

Duramesh registry study: short-term outcomes using mesh suture for abdominal wall closure.

Paige N Hackenberger, Mehul Mittal, Jeffrey Fronza, Michael Shapiro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Early outcomes of umbilical hernia repair with mesh suture.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Early outcomes of contaminated midline incisional hernia repair with mesh suture.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025
    Article
  6. Mesh suture repair of rectus diastasis with and without a concurrent ventral hernia.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025
    Article
  7. Outcomes Following Implantation With Mesh Suture: A Registry of 1111 Patients.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025
    Article
  8. Repair of Massive Pediatric Abdominal Wall Hernia Using Mesh Suture.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Early Experience with Mesh Suture for DIEP Flap Abdominal Site Closures.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paige N HackenbergerDepartment of Surgery, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.
Mehul MittalDepartment of Surgery, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.
Jeffrey FronzaDepartment of Surgery, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.
Michael ShapiroDepartment of Surgery, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.
Northwestern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Sutures are flexible linear elements that join tissue and maintain their hold with a surgeon-created knot. Tension at the suture/tissue interface can cut the very tissues that sutures are designed to hold, leading to dehiscence and incisional hernia formation. A new suture design (Duramesh, Mesh Suture Inc., Chicago, IL) was approved for marketing by the United States Food and Drug Administration in September 2022. The multiple filaments of the mesh suture are designed to diffuse tension at the suture/tissue interface thereby limiting pull-through. The macroporosity and hollow core of the mesh suture encourage fibrovascular incorporation for a durable repair. We created the first registry and clinical report of patients undergoing mesh suture implantation to assess its real-world effectiveness. Methods: A patient registry was created based on institutional implant logs from January to August 2023 at an integrated health-care system. Operative reports were reviewed by the study team to verify use of "Duramesh" by dictation. Retrospective chart review was conducted to evaluate patient and surgical characteristics, follow-up, and short-term outcomes of interest. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Chi-squared analysis with Microsoft Excel and GraphPad Prism. Results: Three hundred seventy-nine separate implantations by 56 surgeons across 12 (sub) specialties at a university hospital and two community hospitals were performed. Mesh suture was used for treatment of the abdominal wall in 314 cases. Follow-up averaged 80.8 ± 52.4 days. The most common abdominal wall indications were ventral hernia repair ( Conclusions: Short-term registry data demonstrates the wide diversity of surgical disciplines and scenarios in which mesh suture has been used to date. The early adoption of mesh suture into practice highlights that consequences of suture pull-through influence operative decision making. As this is the first interim report of the Duramesh mesh suture registry, follow-up is too short for characterization of long-term durability of abdominal wall closures.

Indexed as

abdominal wallherniaincisional herniainnovationmesh

Identifiers

PMID38274351
PMCPMC10809794
OpenAlexW4390752433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.