Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38274309›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023

Prognostic influence of mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation on survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest undergoing ECPR on VA-ECMO.

A Springer, A Dreher, J Reimers, L Kaiser, E Bahlmann, H van der Schalk, P Wohlmuth, N Gessler, K Hassan, J Wietz and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

A SpringerDepartment of Cardiology and Critical Care, Asklepios Clinic St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
A DreherDepartment of Cardiology and Critical Care, Asklepios Clinic St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
J ReimersDepartment of Cardiology and Critical Care, Asklepios Clinic St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
L KaiserDepartment of Cardiology and Critical Care, Asklepios Clinic St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
E BahlmannDepartment of Cardiology and Critical Care, Asklepios Clinic St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
H van der SchalkDepartment of Cardiology and Critical Care, Asklepios Clinic St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
P WohlmuthAsklepios ProResearch, Hamburg, Germany.
N GesslerDepartment of Cardiology and Critical Care, Asklepios Clinic St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
K HassanDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Asklepios Clinic St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
J WietzDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Asklepios Clinic St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
B BeinDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Asklepios Clinic St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
T SpangenbergDepartment of Cardiology and Critical Care, Asklepios Clinic Altona, Hamburg, Germany.
S WillemsDepartment of Cardiology and Critical Care, Asklepios Clinic St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
S HakmiDZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Luebeck, Hamburg, Germany.
E TiggesDepartment of Cardiology and Critical Care, Asklepios Clinic St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
Asklepios Klinik St. Georg · DEAsklepios · DEAsklepios Klinik Altona · DEGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DESemmelweis University · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in selected patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is an established method if return of spontaneous circulation cannot be achieved. Automated chest compression devices (ACCD) facilitate transportation of patients under ongoing CPR and might improve outcome. We thus sought to evaluate prognostic influence of mechanical CPR using ACCD in patients presenting with OHCA treated with ECPR including VA-ECMO. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data of 171 consecutive patients treated for OHCA using ECPR in our cardiac arrest center from the years 2016 to 2022. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify characteristics related with survival. Results: Of the 171 analyzed patients (84% male, mean age 56 years), 12% survived the initial hospitalization with favorable neurological outcome. The primary reason for OHCA was an acute coronary event (72%) followed by primary arrhythmia (9%) and non-ischemic cardiogenic shock (6.7%). In most cases, the collapse was witnessed (83%) and bystander CPR was performed (83%). The median time from collapse to VA-ECMO was 81 min (Q1: 69 min, Q3: 98 min). No survival benefit was seen for patients resuscitated using ACCD. Patients in whom an ACCD was used presented with overall longer times from collapse to ECMO than those who were resuscitated manually [83 min (Q1: 70 min, Q3: 98 min) vs. 69 min (Q1: 57 min, Q3: 84 min), Conclusion: No overall survival benefit of the use of ACCD before ECPR is established was found, possibly due to longer overall CPR duration. This may arguably be because of the limited availability of ACCD in pre-clinical paramedic service at the time of observation. Increasing the availability of these devices might thus improve treatment of OHCA, presumably by providing efficient CPR during transportation and transfer.

Indexed as

ACCDCPRECPROHCAVA-ECMO

Identifiers

PMID38274309
PMCPMC10808304
OpenAlexW4390743035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.