ArticleJournal of health science & education2021
Early Care and Education Professionals' Breastfeeding Knowledge and Practices Before and After an E-Learning Program.
Article in Journal of health science & education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To assess early care and education professionals' breastfeeding knowledge and practices before and after an e-learning program. Participants: Early care and education professionals from New Hampshire (U.S.A.) licensed child care programs were invited to complete a pre-assessment followed by a 90-minute e-learning breastfeeding program. Three months post-training, participants were invited to complete the post-assessment. Analysis: McNemar tests were used to assess changes from pre-post-assessment for dichotomous variables. McNemar-Bowker tests were used to determine differences from pre-post for variables with more than two categories. When the McNemar-Bowker test was significant, a multiple comparison correction (Bonferroni) was used. Results: 114 participants completed the e-learning program and pre-post assessment. Results showed significant improvement from pre-post in 10 of 15 breastfeeding knowledge questions related to health of baby, mother and child care centers, economics, and environmental impact. There were significant changes from pre-post in 24 of 50 breastfeeding practice questions in handling breast milk, promoting breastfeeding, and supporting mothers. Conclusions and Implications: This study indicates improvement in early care and education professionals' breastfeeding knowledge and practices; however, opportunities exist to design targeted initiatives to further strengthen practices that support breastfeeding families in the child care environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.