ReviewEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X2024
About half of Ethiopian midwifery professionals reported being dissatisfied with their jobs: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors influencing turnover intention among midwives: a systematic review.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026Pooled it
- Level of job satisfaction and its associated factors among midwives working in public health institutions, Northwest Ethiopia: a multi-center study.BMC research notes · 2025Article
- Understanding healthcare workers' risk perception and response to healthcare waste in Arba Minch town, Ethiopia: application of the extended parallel process model.BMC health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Increasing well qualified health professionals is a part of sustainable development goal to specially to decrease maternal mortality below 70 per 100,000 deaths. Contrarily, The Nursing and midwifery councils (NMC) expect that 36% of healthcare workers, especially midwives, are leaving their jobs due to high turnover rates and job unhappiness worldwide. Methods: Studies were rigorously searched utilizing international databases from PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and Embase. Using the New Castle Ottawa scale for a cross-sectional study design, the quality of the articles that were searched was evaluated. The systemic review was conducted using the random effect approach, and statistical analysis was done using STATA version 17 software for the window. The Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline was followed for reporting results. Results: A total of nine observational cross-sectional studies were included in this review. The pooled level of job satisfaction among midwives in Ethiopia was 52.2% (95% CI =41.7, 62.9). The pooled odds ratio showed that a significant positive association was found between midwives' job satisfaction and studied variables. Male midwife (OR = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.04, 0.87), fair supervision (OR = 2.03; 95%CI: 1.58-1), workload (OR = 1.72; 95%CI: 1.102-2.43) and motivation (OR = 1.64; 95%CI: 1.02-2.25) were strongly associated with job satisfaction. Conclusion: Evidence suggested that motivating employees, providing fair supervision, fair workloads, and fostering positive relationships with managers are all crucial tactics for retaining and enhancing the satisfaction of health professionals at health care facilities in Ethiopian.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.