Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38274222›Full record

ReviewSeminars in interventional radiology2023

Liver-Directed Therapy Combined with Systemic Therapy: Current Status and Future Directions.

Shamar Young, Jack Hannallah, Dan Goldberg, Mohammad Khreiss, Rachna Shroff, Junaid Arshad, Aaron Scott, Gregory Woodhead

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in interventional radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 60% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shamar YoungDivision of Interventional Radiology, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Jack HannallahDivision of Interventional Radiology, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Dan GoldbergDivision of Interventional Radiology, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Mohammad KhreissDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Rachna ShroffDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Junaid ArshadDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Aaron ScottDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Gregory WoodheadDivision of Interventional Radiology, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Banner - University Medical Center Tucson · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past several decades, major advances in both systemic and locoregional therapies have been made for many cancer patients. This has led to modern cancer treatment algorithms frequently calling for active interventions by multiple subspecialists at the same time. One of the areas where this can be clearly seen is the concomitant use of locoregional and systemic therapies in patients with primary or secondary cancers of the liver. These combined algorithms have gained favor over the last decade and are largely focused on the allure of the combined ability to control systemic disease while at the same time addressing refractory/resistant clonal populations. While the general concept has gained favor and is likely to only increase in popularity with the continued establishment of viable immunotherapy treatments, for many patients questions remain. Lingering concerns over the increase in toxicity when combining treatment methods, patient selection, and sequencing remain for multiple cancer patient populations. While further work remains, some of these questions have been addressed in the literature. This article reviews the available data on three commonly treated primary and secondary cancers of the liver, namely, hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and metastatic colorectal cancer. Furthermore, strengths and weaknesses are reviewed and future directions are discussed.

Indexed as

hepatocellular carcinomaimmunotherapyinterventional radiologyintrahepatic cholangiocarcinomametastatic colorectal cancerthermal ablationtransarterial chemoembolizationtransarterial radioembolization

Identifiers

PMID38274222
PMCPMC10807971
OpenAlexW4391182888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.