Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38274123›Full record

ArticleInternet interventions2024

Measuring digital intervention user experience with a novel ecological momentary assessment (EMA) method, CORTO.

Lauri Lukka, Veli-Matti Karhulahti, Vilma-Reetta Bergman, J Matias Palva

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Internet interventions, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lauri LukkaDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Finland.
Veli-Matti KarhulahtiFaculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
Vilma-Reetta BergmanDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Finland.
J Matias PalvaDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital interventions often suffer from low usage, which may reflect insufficient attention to user experience. Moreover, the existing evaluation methods have limited applicability in the remote study of user experience of complex interventions that have expansive content and that are used over an extensive period of time. To alleviate these challenges, we describe here a novel qualitative Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) method: the CORTO method (Contextual, One-item, Repeated, Timely, Open-ended). We used it to gather digital intervention user experience data from Finnish adults (

Indexed as

Digital interventionsEcological momentary assessmentEngagementEvaluation methodsFormative evaluationInterviewingMental healthMethodologyMixed methodsQualitative studyQuestionnaireRemote studySerious gamesUser experience

Identifiers

PMID38274123
PMCPMC10808917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.