ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024
A deep learning fusion network trained with clinical and high-frequency ultrasound images in the multi-classification of skin diseases in comparison with dermatologists: a prospective and multicenter study.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence in dermatology: A literature review of current evidence and clinical implementation.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2026Review
- EPI-Sense: an integrated hemodynamic sensing and analysis system for early pressure injury warning.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- DVM-SLC: A Dual-View Meta-Aware Model for Reliable Multi-Class Skin Lesion Classification from Clinical and Dermoscopic Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Solid Hydrogel Couplants for Skin Superficial Blood Flow Imaging With Super-Resolution Ultrasound.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026Article
- Deep Learning-Based Skin Lesion Classification: A CNN Approach on High-Frequency Ultrasound Imaging.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026Article
- Highlighting a histopathological dilemma: atypical dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans diagnosed with multimodal dermoscopy.Skin health and disease · 2026Article
- Ultra-High-Frequency Ultrasound of Melanoma Excision Scars for Detection of Clinically Occult Local Recurrence: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- A deep learning fusion network trained with medical records and laryngoscopic images in the early diagnosis of glottic carcinoma.iScience · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence and New Technologies in Melanoma Diagnosis: A Narrative Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- The Diagnostic Value of High-Frequency Ultrasound in Unclarified Lesions at the End of Extremities.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Ultrasound-based radiogenomics: status, applications, and future direction.Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) · 2025Article
- Skin disease diagnosis using decision and feature level fusion of deep features.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clinical appearance and high-frequency ultrasound (HFUS) are indispensable for diagnosing skin diseases by providing internal and external information. However, their complex combination brings challenges for primary care physicians and dermatologists. Thus, we developed a deep multimodal fusion network (DMFN) model combining analysis of clinical close-up and HFUS images for binary and multiclass classification in skin diseases. Methods: Between Jan 10, 2017, and Dec 31, 2020, the DMFN model was trained and validated using 1269 close-ups and 11,852 HFUS images from 1351 skin lesions. The monomodal convolutional neural network (CNN) model was trained and validated with the same close-up images for comparison. Subsequently, we did a prospective and multicenter study in China. Both CNN models were tested prospectively on 422 cases from 4 hospitals and compared with the results from human raters (general practitioners, general dermatologists, and dermatologists specialized in HFUS). The performance of binary classification (benign vs. malignant) and multiclass classification (the specific diagnoses of 17 types of skin diseases) measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were evaluated. This study is registered with www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2300074765). Findings: The performance of the DMFN model (AUC, 0.876) was superior to that of the monomodal CNN model (AUC, 0.697) in the binary classification ( Interpretation: The DMFN model combining analysis of clinical close-up and HFUS images exhibited satisfactory performance in the binary and multiclass classification compared with the dermatologists. It may be a valuable tool for general dermatologists and primary care providers. Funding: This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and the Clinical research project of Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.