Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38274116›Full record

ReviewEClinicalMedicine2024

Cognitive behavioural therapy for the treatment of schizophrenia spectrum disorders: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.

Steven Berendsen, Silke Berendse, Jeanne van der Torren, Jentien Vermeulen, Lieuwe de Haan

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
16.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry · 2026
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Metacognitive training (MCT) for psychosis: a systematic review and grade recommendations.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Real-world comprehensive care of people living with schizophrenia: recommendations across different settings and clinical stages.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Steven BerendsenDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location Academic Medical Center, the Netherlands.
Silke BerendseDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location Academic Medical Center, the Netherlands.
Jeanne van der TorrenDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location Academic Medical Center, the Netherlands.
Jentien VermeulenDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location Academic Medical Center, the Netherlands.
Lieuwe de HaanDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location Academic Medical Center, the Netherlands.
Academic Medical Center · NLDimence · NLReinier van Arkel · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) forms the standard psychotherapy for schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD). We aimed to summarize and evaluate the evidence on the effectiveness of CBT for SSD. Methods: In this umbrella review, we searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database, and PsychInfo, for meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of CBT in SSD published between database inception up to Aug 18, 2023. Inclusion criteria were RCTs investigating individually provided CBT in a population of patients with SSD, compared to either standard care, treatment as usually, or any other psychosocial therapies. No restrictions concerning follow-up or language were applied. We used the "assessment of multiple systematic reviews" (AMSTAR-2) appraisal checklist for the evaluation of methodological quality of meta-analysis. We extracted summary metrics from eligible studies in duplicate. The strength of evidence was classified by the sample size, p-value, excess significance bias, prediction intervals, significance of largest study, and heterogeneity. The strength of evidence was ranked according to established criteria as: convincing, highly suggestive, suggestive, weak, or not significant. Primary outcomes were general psychopathology, positive and negative symptoms. This study is registered in PROSPERO, CRD42022334671. Findings: We found 26 eligible meta-analyses, of which 16 meta-analyses provided sufficient data. Using the AMSTAR-2, we found limitations in details concerning the selection of study design, quality of the search and reporting of funding in included meta-analyses. A minority of 42.9% of the comparisons showed a significant result in favor of CBT; 57.1% were non-significant with no convincing or highly suggestive evidence. Suggestive evidence was found in favor of CBT for general psychopathology (6.2%, N = 34 RCTs, effect size (ES) = -0.33 (-0.47; -0.19), I Interpretation: Findings suggest that the effectiveness of CBT on general and positive symptoms in SSD at EoT was small to medium, while we found inconsistent evidence for a sustainable effect. CBT has no convincing impact on other relevant outcomes. Guidelines may use these results to specify their recommendations. Funding: None.

Indexed as

Cognitive behavioural therapyPsychosisSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID38274116
PMCPMC10809079
OpenAlexW4390599238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.