Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38274002›Full record

ArticleBiomedical signal processing and control2023

Reference free auscultation quality metric and its trends.

Annapurna Kala, Eric D McCollum, Mounya Elhilali

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical signal processing and control, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Annapurna KalaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.
Eric D McCollumGlobal Program of Pediatric Respiratory Sciences, Eudowood Division of Pediatric Respiratory Sciences, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Mounya ElhilaliDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Multiscale modeling of the cocktail party problemU01AG058532 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ELHILALI, MOUNYA · 2018 to 2022
$2.3M
SCH: Smart Auscultation for Pulmonary Diagnostics and ImagingR01HL163439 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ELHILALI, MOUNYA · 2022 to 2025
$1.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL163439NIA NIH HHS U01 AG058532
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stethoscopes are used ubiquitously in clinical settings to 'listen' to lung sounds. The use of these systems in a variety of healthcare environments (hospitals, urgent care rooms, private offices, community sites, mobile clinics, etc.) presents a range of challenges in terms of ambient noise and distortions that mask lung signals from being heard clearly or processed accurately using auscultation devices. With advances in technology, computerized techniques have been developed to automate analysis or access a digital rendering of lung sounds. However, most approaches are developed and tested in controlled environments and do not reflect real-world conditions where auscultation signals are typically acquired. Without a priori access to a recording of the ambient noise (for signal-to-noise estimation) or a reference signal that reflects the true undistorted lung sound, it is difficult to evaluate the quality of the lung signal and its potential clinical interpretability. The current study proposes an objective reference-free Auscultation Quality Metric (AQM) which incorporates low-level signal attributes with high-level representational embeddings mapped to a nonlinear quality space to provide an independent evaluation of the auscultation quality. This metric is carefully designed to solely judge the signal based on its integrity relative to external distortions and masking effects and not confuse an adventitious breathing pattern as low-quality auscultation. The current study explores the robustness of the proposed AQM method across multiple clinical categorizations and different distortion types. It also evaluates the temporal sensitivity of this approach and its translational impact for deployment in digital auscultation devices.

Indexed as

Auscultation qualityClinical validationComputerized auscultation analysisNo-reference metric

Identifiers

PMID38274002
PMCPMC10809975
OpenAlexW4360609666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.